691 W 925 S — Rental and Listing History
The staging allegation includes the possibility that the attackers rented the house rather than owned it. If true, that leaves a paper and platform trail — a lease, a booking, or a listing. This page records what public listing sources currently show, and what they do not.
What the public listing sources show
As of the searches done for this page:
- Not currently for sale or rent. Real-estate aggregators (Trulia, Zillow, Movoto) list 691 W 925 S as a residential property that is not actively on the market and carry no active rental listing for it.
- No short-term-rental listing was found tying this exact address to Airbnb or Vrbo. General searches surface many Orem basement suites and vacation rentals near UVU, but none matched this specific address. Absence from a public search is not proof the home was never listed — listings are routinely taken down, and short-term platforms hide exact addresses until booking.
- A nearby comparable at 683 W 925 S carries a rent estimate (around $4,200/mo on Zillow) purely as an automated valuation of a different house — noted only so the block's rental context is clear, not as anything about 691.
- Utah-specific rental boards checked, nothing found for this exact address. KSL Classifieds (the dominant Utah rental board), Apartments.com, and Furnished Finder all surface Orem rentals but return no active listing for 691 W 925 S. As above, current-search absence does not prove the house was never listed — expired and deleted listings do not always remain indexed.
Sources: Trulia, Movoto, and general Airbnb/Vrbo search results for the Orem area.
Why this is the testable part of the claim
Of everything in the staging allegation, "was it rented?" is the piece that can actually be checked against records:
- A long-term lease would show in a property-management file or a landlord's records.
- A short-term booking (Airbnb, Vrbo, Furnished Finder, a private furnished rental) would show in platform and payment records for September 2025.
- A for-sale or for-rent listing would show in MLS history and the aggregators' delisted-listing archives.
None of those are visible in open public search today. That is a reason to treat the "rented" theory as unconfirmed, and a reason to look — because if such a record exists, it is the single most decisive item in this whole section.
Open questions
- Was 691 W 925 S ever listed for short- or long-term rent, and if so, when and on which platform?
- Was it occupied by anyone other than an owner in the weeks around September 10, 2025?
- Do delisted-listing archives or a property manager show a lease or booking for that window?
- Do any citizen-investigation posts cite a screenshot of a real listing for this address? (None verified as of this writing.)
Laws (Charlie Kirk)
Rental agreements, booking records, and payment trails for any property tied to the case sit behind private platforms and landlords — the Charlie Kirk Investigation Laws are aimed at compelling exactly this kind of record into a transparent investigation.
Interesting In This Area
- UVU has owned the house since 2019, so use records are public.
- The tax rows stop behaving like an ordinary residential property afterwards.
- GRAMA request two asks the university for leases and key issuance.
- The staging claim includes renting, which is the testable half.
Interesting In Other Areas
- Every location in the case is indexed, including the disputed properties.
- The university response record covers what it did and did not release.
- Doorbell cameras on these blocks recorded more than any listing ever would.
- Four proposed federal laws would compel booking and payment records directly.
Other Pages In This Section
The Staging Allegation — 691 W 925 S
The claim is one sentence long, with no named source, no date and no described evidence. The page states it exactly as recorded, then sets out the five things that would confirm or kill it.
Read thisThe routing hub for everything past 12:23 PM — surrender, paving, gag orders, resignations, visa enforcement. It is built as a question-first table, so you start from what you actually want to know instead of from a chronology.
Read this691 W 925 S — Citizen Investigation Coverage
The log of what citizen investigators actually claimed about the house: a 7:48 "command center" walkthrough, a TikTok vacancy claim, and the pushback on the same threads. Claims are preserved here so they can be checked, not adopted.
Read this691 W 925 S — Ownership on Record
UVU bought the house in 2019 for $900,000 and described it in board minutes as "contiguous to campus." A public body owning it changes what the staging lead is: not a private mystery, but a records request.
Read thisElsewhere In The Investigation
A hyperlinked index of every location that matters: the courtyard, the roof, the custody chain, the airports, the hospital and the disputed properties north of campus.
Read this
GRAMA records, undelivered warnings, emergency alerts and the university's handling of its own files — the institutional half of September 10. The same institution turns out to own the house north of campus.
Read this
Every camera thread in one hub: Ring and doorbell footage, UVU CCTV, the broadcast rig, mobile eyewitness video and the merchant cameras. Doorbell video is where the most concrete vehicle evidence came from.
Read this
Four federal laws modeled on the Epstein Files Act, drafted to force disclosure and mandate a real investigation. Every unanswered question in the aftermath is downstream of records nobody can compel today.
Read thisThis website's author is @HolonCitizen on X and YouTube/@HolonCitizen. Follow me there.
Interesting
- The ATF jacket comparison was inconclusive, then sealed — gag orders and secrecy.
- Slow motion reportedly shows black shards dropping from under his shirt as he collapses.
- Candace Owens rejects the .30-06 account, citing the clean shirt and absent spatter.