X — Candace Owens Engagement Bans
@ProjectConstitu published a widely shared post titled in substance: "They're Banning THOUSANDS of Us for Simply LIKING, REPLYING or REPOSTING CANDACE OWENS POST." This page documents that reported wave — not a proven platform policy or donor conspiracy.
What users report
According to the post and amplifying commentary:
- Thousands of accounts hit with suspensions, 12-hour locks, shadowbans, and "limited visibility" warnings
- Triggers allegedly include liking, retweeting, or commenting on @RealCandaceO posts about the Kirk assassination
- Violation categories cited repeatedly: "violent speech," "hateful conduct," "harassment"
Topics tied to enforcement (claims)
Commentary links enforcement timing to Candace threads on:
- Maroon shirts / Egyptian plane contractors
- Israeli Google Trends spikes pre-event
- Foreign money / donor threads inside TPUSA
We do not assert any donor network or TPUSA insider illegally operated bot-report farms. The post characterizes enforcement as coordinated reporting; X has not released data confirming that.
Archive campaign
Project Constitution urged readers to screenshot every suspension and post ban notices publicly so the scale could be documented — a citizen counter-archive parallel to IPFS evidence pinning.
Broader context
Long-form treatment: CoverUp — Censorship of Investigators (disclaimer + moderation counterarguments).
Citizen Investigator Claims on X (2026 research)
:::note Attribution The claims below come from public X/Twitter posts, hearing notes, and citizen-investigator commentary captured in mid-2026 research. They are not court findings. Living persons are presumed innocent. The site does not assert that any living person planned or carried out Charlie Kirk's death. :::
Focus of this page
ProjectConstitu thousands suspended for engaging @RealCandaceO — bot-report allegation attributed.
Claims and discussions circulating (do not treat as proven)
ProjectConstitu: thousands suspended for engaging @RealCandaceO.
Cross-cutting X signals that touch this topic
- Pre-event donor pressure (as reported): Candace Owens publicized private messages (authenticity discussed with TPUSA spokesman Andrew Kolvet in mainstream commentary) in which Charlie reportedly wrote ~48 hours before Sept 10 that donor pressure was "leaving me no choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause," and that he had lost a major donor after refusing to cancel Tucker Carlson. These are private-text claims, not a formal public policy renunciation, and they do not establish who fired any shot.
- July 2026 preliminary hearing: Citizen live-notes and press describe defense challenges to FBI DNA methods and ATF ballistics (including inconclusive comparisons widely discussed online), plus multi-agency testimony on the Sept 11 surrender chain.
- Information control: Threads continue on gag orders, Ryne Simmons video, platform deboosting, and rapid crime-scene paving (Lead Investigator Hull reportedly learned of paving via news, per circulating hearing notes).
- Counter-claims: Other accounts insist surveillance, DNA, texts, and admissions support a lone-actor charging narrative and treat foreign-intel theories as unsubstantiated. Present both sides; Tyler Robinson is charged, not convicted.
Open questions raised by investigators
- What primary documents (GRAMA, work orders, unredacted orders, bodycam) would resolve disputes on this page's core claims?
- Which circulating posts have independent corroboration vs single-source amplification?
- How do July 2026 hearing exhibits (when unsealed or accurately transcribed) change the weight of earlier X threads?
Deeper related reading: After overview · CoverUp overview · FBI overview · Fix Laws.
Related
Interesting In This Area
- Softer reach suppression leaves posts visible while slowing how far they travel.
- Brussels fined the same platform 120 million euros on transparency grounds in December 2025.
- Cease-and-desist letters do the same work without appearing in any analytics.
- A poll about the rifle account reportedly would not publish at all.
Interesting In Other Areas
- Candace Owens ran the largest independent probe and published the texts it argues over.
- Her Israel controversies include a nine-person chat dated September 8, 2025.
- This site's own account reports monetisation removed and replies deboosted.
- Her show is where several document trails cited here surfaced first.
Other Pages In This Section
Reported reach suppression on X for accounts working the ballistics, FBI and foreign-nexus threads. Reach is the only distribution a citizen investigator has.
Read thisGoogle Search & Trends Scrubbing
The censorship section's record of vanishing graphs: campus scout terms, case names, and the archives researchers keep because live results shift. This is framed as record loss, not merely ranking.
Read thisDecember 5, 2025: Brussels issued the first Digital Services Act fine ever, €120 million against the platform where nearly all citizen investigation of September 10 actually lives. The three findings were transparency failures, not moderation — which is exactly what the two sides argue about.
Read this
Age restrictions, demonetization and strikes on investigation videos, plus violence-policy removals at Meta. Ordinary enforcement or narrative pressure — the page documents the cases and lets you judge.
Read thisElsewhere In The Investigation

She called Charlie her best friend and brother, then ran the largest independent probe of his death. She also published the texts, the tipline and the SUV photographs the rest of the case now argues over.
Read this
Candace Owens Israel Controversies (Media)
Owens released material from a nine-person WhatsApp chat dated September 8, 2025, including a line about losing a $2 million donor over not cancelling Tucker Carlson. Outlets split between aggregating her claims and fact-checking them.
Read thisX @HolonCitizen Appears Demonetized and Throttled (Claims)
Monetisation reportedly removed, replies folded, and a paid campaign that delivered roughly fifty views against a represented hundred thousand. Self-reported analytics are weak evidence; they are also the only evidence a platform ever leaves a user.
Read this
The single largest independent engine driving this investigation into public view. Several of the document trails cited across this site surfaced first on her episodes.
Read thisImages

This website's author is @HolonCitizen on X and YouTube/@HolonCitizen. Follow me there.
Interesting
- A judge reportedly issued a gag order on his own motion; neither side had asked.
- One draft law would even bar agencies from surveilling employees who join an investigation.
- Another would let named civilians pick their own FBI and intelligence teams, bypassing command.