← Drones

Drones — Investigation Index

Drone threads in the Charlie Kirk case split into three buckets: (1) military/government UAS tied to N1098L and Provo-week exercises, (2) event-level camera drones (TPUSA production B-roll and crowd operators), and (3) weaponized-drone theories (Israeli quadcopter, Switchblade, DARPA air-drop) that some citizen investigators propose as alternatives to the rooftop .30-06 story. This site does not claim any person or agency used a drone to kill Charlie Kirk unless citing a court record or attributed allegation.

Priority reads

1. Did a HADES jet deploy drones near UVU that morning? → N1098L Air-Launched Drones
2. Did TPUSA fly a drone while denying security overwatch? → TPUSA Production Drone
3. What did campus security actually deploy? → UVU Security & No Drones
4. Fast objects on citizen video? → Military Drones on Video
5. Butler PA parallel? → Butler PA Drone Parallel

Topic index

Military and government-linked

• N1098L Air-Launched Drones — drop 9:16 AM, pickup 12:48 PM MT; John Cullen / HADES
• Switchblade & DARPA Claims — loitering munition and X-65 airdrop theories
• Counter-UAS at Provo Airport — Egyptian contractors Sept 4–10 (Proof Intel)

Event coverage and denials

• TPUSA Production Drone — birthday video, Frank Turek, cease-and-desist admission
• Butch Hibbs & Crowd Drones — Utah operator, eyewitness controller photo
• UVU Security & No Drones — six campus officers, AP reporting, no preventive UAS

Weaponized theories (attributed / speculative)

• Israeli Armed Quadcopter — Gaza-documented platforms applied to UVU (unverified)
• Military Drones on Video — 150 mph passes, Blake Bednarz "16 drones" thread
• Butler PA Drone Parallel — NCTC "same group" allegation vs Butler 2024

Disclosure targets

Who received drone video feeds, N1098L telemetry, FAA authorizations for UVU airspace, and Counter-UAS test orders Sept 4–10 are among items the Charlie Kirk Investigation Laws may force into public record.

Investigators' watch list (2026 research notes)

Routing notes for readers following Drones — Investigation Index — claims are attributed discourse, not verdicts:

Drone investigation memo hub.

Signal (as discussed on X)	Why it is watched
July 2026 prelim forensics fights	DNA/ballistics contested in open court notes
Platform + gag-order dual track	Speech limits for witnesses and OSINT accounts
Pre-event donor / GRAMA material	Motive and warning chronology still incomplete

Jump to peer Level 3 pages for full attributed detail. Preserve hub purpose: navigate first, essay second.

Commentator coverage: Citizen journalist Ian Carroll has flown his own drone over the Losee Center roof as part of his footage analysis, arguing in his posts that no rifle is visible on the rooftop figure — aerial OSINT he presents as raising questions, not as proof of any alternative mechanism.

Related

• N1098L HADES Over UVU
• Planes — N1098L
• Security Team — Perimeter Failures
• Proof Not Tyler — Alternative Mechanisms
• Cover Up

Interesting In This Area

• N1098L is the strongest government-linked thread; the TPUSA flight is the only admitted one.
• Campus police engaged no drones; news drones filmed the rooftop afterwards.
• Switchblade and DARPA routing comes from flight geometry, not released inventory.
• Butler and Gaza quadcopter threads are pattern arguments, explicitly not proof.

Interesting In Other Areas

• Counter-drone gear was reportedly tested at Provo on DoD Liaison badges.
• Only grainy re-encodes of the campus HD system have reached the public.
• No rooftop sweep preceded the event, and no counter-snipers watched the high ground.
• The HADES program is real, contracted, and built on that same airframe.

Other Pages In This Section

N1098L Air-Launched Drones

An Army HADES jet made low passes over Orem at 9:16 AM and again at 12:48 PM — about twenty-five minutes after the shooting. Analysts read drop and recovery; no mission order has been released.

Read this

TPUSA Production Drone

A cease-and-desist letter reportedly conceded what the public statements denied: a media drone flew for B-roll before the event while the protective detail had none. Media got the aerial view; security did not.

Read this

UVU Security & No Drones

Six campus officers, perimeter duty, and no security drone — that is the documented deployment for September 10. The university runs its own drone program; it was not used to protect the event.

Read this

Military Drones on Video

A 150 mph pass at fifty meters lasts under a second, which is why eyewitness drone counts run from zero to sixteen. The page separates streak claims on phone video from the one drone anybody admits flew.

Read this

Elsewhere In The Investigation

Provo Airport Counter-UAS

Egyptian-linked contractors reportedly tested counter-drone gear at Provo the week of the killing, on U.S. DoD Liaison badges and a clearance to skip screening. Ten minutes from campus, and unverified.

Read this

UVU HD Surveillance Never Publicly Released (Claims)

The affidavit tracks a suspect across campus almost entirely on university cameras, yet only grainy re-encoded clips have reached the public. The original DVR exports and their per-frame timestamps have not.

Read this

Perimeter & Rooftop Failures

Six campus officers, no thorough rooftop inspection, and a prone all-black figure reportedly on the same roof an hour before the shot. The clearest physical security failure under any theory of the killing.

Read this

US Army HADES (Drone Launching Planes)

HADES is a real, publicly contracted Army ISR program built on the same Global 6500 airframe as N1098L. Defense-trade reporting separately describes Army interest in launching drones from that airframe.

Read this

This website's author is @HolonCitizen on X and YouTube/@HolonCitizen. Follow me there.

Interesting

• An eyewitness photo reportedly shows a drone operator trailing Charlie through the crowd.
• A foreign-agent filing eight days after the killing points to Clock Tower X LLC.
• The July 31 White House session traces back to one billionaire funder.