aducarrabh — X Posts
@aducarrabh posted one of the earliest high-engagement frame analyses of the shooting — on September 10, 2025 itself, reaching roughly 238k views. The claims below are the poster's own frame reading, which this site neither endorses nor rejects.
Claims from X posts
- "Something whizzes by Charlie Kirk a split second before impact" — an observation about the footage that anyone can attempt to check against the clip. (Primary post)
- "The bullet also appears to have, indeed, ricocheted off of his vest and through his neck" — an interpretation of wound mechanics that cannot be established from video; whether body armor was worn has not been established, and no ballistic report supports a deflection.
- The site's write-up separates the two claims deliberately: the moving-object observation is checkable, the ricochet mechanism is not. See the frame's evidence page.
Investigative value
This post sits in the site's catalog of day-one impact analyses on Shot in the Heart, alongside @whipwesur's stiffening-on-impact angle and @CheriJacobus's vest close-up. The "whizzes by" observation connects to separate threads about what else may have been in the air or on Kirk's person — see Drones and the Mic analysis.
Related
Interesting In This Area
- Matt Tardio says a .30-06 can fail to leave an exit wound.
- alexboge rejects the device reading this frame is used to support.
- bgilberg79 argues the shirt moved before the wound appeared.
- Based Sam Parker holds the raw inventory behind the motive threads.
Interesting In Other Areas
- Whether body armour was worn has never been established on the public record.
- The device conclusion is where most citizen investigators landed.
- Something else in the air means drones and an ISR jet.
- The mic hub collects the video, audio and procurement strands together.
Other Pages In This Section
An aggregation account whose screenshots became evidence — the alleged $150 million offer, the leaked texts about Ben Shapiro. Archived because they circulated widely, not because they were verified.
Read thisTwo visual-comparison claims tying people near the case to Fort Huachuca — carpet, wall colour, a public promo photograph. Visual matches are the weakest evidence class this site tracks, and the page says so before it says anything else.
Read this
A veteran voice who cuts across both camps: his ammunition commentary supports the exit-wound argument for a rifle, while his physics critique undercuts the exploding-mic theory. Useful precisely because he is not picking a side.
Read this
The raw claim inventory behind the Sam Parker profile: flight data, ballistics questions, the Israeli-IP search dates, the $150 million allegation. Every line is a post, attributed and dated, not a finding.
Read thisElsewhere In The Investigation
Explosive in Mic Likely Killed Charlie
The finding citizen investigators on X have converged on: a device at the microphone, not a round from a roof. It is the single largest divergence between the public record and the government's account.
Read this
The hub for airspace as evidence: an Army ISR jet over campus, a media drone TPUSA later acknowledged, and counter-drone testing at Provo the same week. Documented flights first, theories last.
Read this
Microphone — The Exploding Mic Theory
The lavalier clipped to his shirt may have concealed a small explosive — the leading conclusion among citizen investigators, and the thread that runs through video, audio, procurement, and post-event debris.
Read thisTwo different claims get blurred together: that no autopsy happened, and that one happened and the report was never released. The second is the accurate one, and it is why almost nothing here is settled.
Read thisThis website's author is @HolonCitizen on X and YouTube/@HolonCitizen. Follow me there.
Interesting
- Raw logs name five Egyptian tail numbers touching Provo one by one.
- Kirk's own poll found roughly 90% opposed joining Israel's war on Iran.
- Baron Coleman says Robinson turned himself in as early as 3 p.m., footage refused.