← X Coverage
Bizarro_Videos — X Posts
@Bizarro_Videos posted some of the earliest day-of frame analysis (September 10, 2025) in the wound-location debate, plus one of the case's most cautionary examples of overreach: the "planted witness" allegation. Both are recorded on this site as the poster's claims only.
Claims from X posts
- Claimed frame-by-frame that "the bullet appears to hit a bulletproof vest on his chest and ricochet up into the neck" — part of the vest/ricochet strand of the Shot in the Heart narrative catalog. (Source)
- Alleged an elderly man interviewed on Fox News saying Kirk was "shot in the heart" was "planted" — asking "Who told him to say that?" The site explicitly does not adopt this: no evidence has been produced for it, and an unidentified person on a live broadcast is a bystander. See the analysis on the Narrative photo page. (Source)
Investigative value
The account matters as a record of how fast the narrative moved — from "what did witnesses see" to "were the witnesses real" within hours of the shot. Its vest-ricochet reading sits inside a larger cluster of impact analyses (@aducarrabh, @CheriJacobus, @themarketswork) that the site catalogs together; its planted-witness claim is preserved as an example of the parts of the arc that do not withstand scrutiny.