cletus_jethro — X Posts
@cletus_jethro is a self-described former USMC explosive breacher (credentials self-reported and unverified) whose December 2025 thread proposed the shaped-charge crucifix-pendant variant of the concealed-explosive theory. The thread was reshared June 21, 2026 by @matt82704417 (post) and its screenshots are archived on this site. Everything below is the author's stated analysis and opinion, not established fact — no explosive device has been recovered, and the official finding remains a rifle shot.
Claims from X posts
- Skeptic of the lapel-mic version — argues an explosive in an unanchored lapel microphone "makes no sense" because the blast would push the mic away rather than drive a penetrator inward. See Mic Explosive.
- Proponent of the pendant version — proposes a cone-shaped PETN micro-charge in the center column of Charlie Kirk's crucifix, anchored by the heavy silver box chain, using the Munroe effect to focus an upward blast toward the neck. Full write-up: The Exploding Pendant.
- PETN math — cites PETN's relative effectiveness (1.66 vs TNT) and 8,400 m/s detonation velocity; argues if a bullet had struck, neck damage would appear before the strange shirt movement, not after. Thread screenshots: Mic Exploding Pendant cluster.
- Electrocution trigger — proposes detonation made dependent on electrocution through the target's own body, arguing this builds in redundancy and synchronizes the blast with a cover sound. Rated SPECULATIVE on electrocution trigger.
- Linked the reported federal search for the necklace to a hunt for explosive residue — see necklace and residue.
Investigative value
The most technically detailed proponent of any concealed-charge mechanism — and simultaneously a rebuttal source against the rival mic-pack version. That proponents place the alleged device in three different locations (mic, pendant, ear) is itself documented as a weakness of the theory.
Related
Interesting In This Area
- aldamu_jo puts the charge in the mic wire; this thread says pendant.
- GoldenOne1980 says lapel microphone instead, inside the same device camp.
- DanCampbel44604 supplied the SUV seating image the pendant threads reuse.
- The CK Files calls the mic story a planted distraction entirely.
Interesting In Other Areas
- Proponents place the alleged device in three different locations — mic, pendant, ear.
- A shaped charge and a bullet leave different wounds, which is the testable part.
- The RØDE transmitter is the specific hardware the argument keeps returning to.
- Explosive residue testing would settle it, and the scene was repaved.
Other Pages In This Section
A timestamped claim of a second moving figure in the roof footage at the second of the shot, taken from a public court stream. It either survives frame-level analysis of the original or it does not — which is exactly the point.
Read thisMarch 31, 2026 seen from the temporal-clustering school — a resignation and a reported inability to match the fragment to the rifle landing in public awareness on the same day. The site records the correlation and declines the causation.
Read this
Diligent Denizen (2) — X Posts
The overflow file for the same account — the casing engravings, the dispatcher who says no autopsy was done, the four separate changes of clothing the official story requires. Read the primary page first; this one carries the exhibits that did not fit.
Read thisElsewhere In The Investigation

Mic vs Pendant — Competing Internal-Device Theories
Two internal-device theories that cannot both be right: the lapel transmitter, or a shaped charge in the crucifix. The argument turns on anchoring, wound direction and veteran analysis.
Read this
Explosive in Mic Likely Killed Charlie
The finding citizen investigators on X have converged on: a device at the microphone, not a round from a roof. It is the single largest divergence between the public record and the government's account.
Read this
Shape Charge vs Bullet: from Medical Examiner results
The medical examiner findings quoted in the court filing — hemopericardium, bilateral hemothorax, subarachnoid hemorrhage — scored against two hypotheses side by side. The clearest place to see which mechanism the injuries actually fit.
Read thisThis website's author is @HolonCitizen on X and YouTube/@HolonCitizen. Follow me there.
Interesting
- A 34-second rooftop window cannot hold the shot, disassembly and descent.
- His organization reportedly turned pro-war within days of his death.
- The Iran section says Iran had nothing to do with it.