JohnParson35771 — X Posts
@JohnParson35771 is a citizen-investigator account cited in the site's event-security failure record for the drone-denial claim. The items below are attributed public claims about staffing and decisions — they do not establish that any UVU officer intentionally enabled a killing.
Claims from X posts
- July 9, 2026 — Stated that Charlie's security team requested drone surveillance for the UVU event and that UVU Campus Police Chief Jeff Long denied the request, adding "I want to hear Long testify" (UVU Campus Police).
- Cited (with @BDPelton) in the under-staffed elevated-security picture: six UVU PD officers, a private detail of ~12, and rooftops unsecured at the speaking site (Public Speaking Event at UVU).
- The drone-denial claim is why citizen investigators treat rooftop jurisdiction and aerial coverage as first-order law-enforcement questions rather than private-security-only failures.
Investigative value
The account supplies one of the sharpest single claims in the security-gap record: that elevated surveillance was requested and refused. If borne out in testimony or records, it would move the rooftop question from hindsight critique to a documented pre-event decision. See Security Team and Drones for the wider picture.
Related
Interesting In This Area
- JustTheTweets17 keeps a parallel list of oversight and security questions.
- Kahlissee preserves screenshots that outlive the posts they came from.
- Josh89220 covers the aircraft side of the same airspace question.
- Trusted Investigators grades which accounts in this section hold up.
Interesting In Other Areas
- UVU security reportedly allowed no drones over the event.
- Rooftop access and the alert that never went out are documented.
- A cease-and-desist and a drone contradiction sit on the TPUSA side.
- Perimeter and rooftop failures are the clearest physical lapse under any theory.
Other Pages In This Section
Live narration of courtroom testimony that an officer's body-camera battery died on the roof. This thread is one of the few contemporaneous public records of that testimony.
Read thisThe podcast clip where a former counterterrorism director talked about the strangeness of the case. That single interview is what turned a halted foreign-ties review into a public story.
Read thisThreads on the SUV interior photographs and the charred material inside them. Amplification rather than analysis — the value is seeing when each photo set entered circulation.
Read thisBystander video argued to show a figure on a building before the shot. Whether the frame shows a person at all is exactly what is disputed, and the doubt stays attached to the claim.
Read thisElsewhere In The Investigation
Six campus officers, perimeter duty, and no security drone — that is the documented deployment for September 10. The university runs its own drone program; it was not used to protect the event.
Read thisUVU Campus Security Gaps on September 10
Staffing, rooftop access, law-enforcement coordination and the emergency alert that did not go out — the documented and alleged failures on the university side.
Read this
The Cease-and-Desist and the Drone Contradiction (Claims)
Candace Owens says a TPUSA cease-and-desist letter conceded a media drone flew for B-roll before the event while security drones were denied. She calls that a contradiction. Two different aircraft and two different approvals — a letter saying both is drawing a distinction.
Read this
Six campus officers, no thorough rooftop inspection, and a prone all-black figure reportedly on the same roof an hour before the shot. The clearest physical security failure under any theory of the killing.
Read thisInteresting
- A veteran's .30-06 exit-behavior argument is used by both sides of the dispute.
- Commentary alleges a double deletion of surrender CCTV and intake bodycam.
- A witness says an FBI contact advised him to erase his own video; he published it instead.
This website's author is @HolonCitizen on X and YouTube/@HolonCitizen. Follow me there.