← X Coverage
MamaCrazee — X Posts
@MamaCrazee posts in the Robinson-defense lane of the case. The items below are attributed social claims from July 2026 hearing-week traffic — opinion and argument, not court findings. Tyler Robinson is charged, not convicted, and presumed innocent.
Claims from X posts
- July 12, 2026 — Argued Robinson is "innocent until proven guilty," that the state holds only circumstantial evidence of the shot, and framed Robinson as a patsy — an attributed social claim recorded on More Reasons.
- Same posts advanced the wound-severity argument: a .30-06 "would have blown CK's head off" and there was no exit wound — part of the caliber-versus-wound debate on A .30-06 Did Not Kill Charlie.
- The site records the counter-positions in the same ledger: mainstream explainers (e.g. @MarioNawfal) treat a lodged bullet with no exit as ordinary trauma pathology, and prosecution-leaning posts cite DNA, etched rounds, and video presence.
Investigative value
@MamaCrazee's posts typify the high-engagement patsy framing that surged during the July 2026 preliminary hearing — useful to the record as an example of how the inconclusive ATF fragment report was converted into innocence arguments, and how the site's rule (probable cause is not a verdict, in either direction) applies to both camps.