@ProjectConstitu is among the citizen investigators posting flight data, ballistics questions, drone sightings, and agency-involvement theories about the UVU shooting. The bullets below are claims attributed to their X posts — not confirmed findings. Each line links to the cited post where available.
The account's threads run alongside the state's prosecution of Tyler Robinson, whose case the site examines at Tyler Robinson.
Hats were flying as the crowd cheered Charlie Kirk during the Q&A session just before the shooting. (Source)
The Q&A at the UVU event dived into discussions about guns, foreshadowing the incident. (Source)
There was one razor-sharp bang, like a firecracker, during the shooting of Charlie Kirk. (Source)
Charlie Kirk's head snapped back in blood, resulting in an instant kill from the shot. (Source)
After the shot, there was dead silence followed by frenzy, with the crowd dropping and surging to the back exit. (Source)
An eyewitness was inches away from Charlie Kirk and snagged a hat mid-air during the incident. (Source)
There was no echo from the shot due to the crowd and clothes absorbing the sound like a trap. (Source)
The sound felt like it rose upward, ruling out a roof or balcony origin because the canopy would block the view and angle. (Source)
The trajectory of the shot was at eye level with no ricochet or external noise. (Source)
Outside the event, George Zen, a broke devout LDS loner with no gun, was cuffed fast by plainclothes cops. (Source)
George Zen is considered an obvious patsy in the shooting. (Source)
The UVU event was low-key with only 2-3 black-shirt guards and sketchy audio setup, tinny Q&A mics versus clear for Charlie Kirk. (Source)
An eyewitness suggested a remote speaker rig for the shot sound. (Source)
Theory: The shot was from a concealed remote device at the top inside the tent/canopy, triggered wirelessly for precision. (Source)
The mic could have blasted the pop through speakers, with no visible shooter and chaos covering escape. (Source)
The eyewitness account supports internal tent tech based on direction, acoustics, and staging vibes. (Source)
Called for forensics on tent fixtures before teardown to test the account's theory that a device was planted. No device has been found or documented, and no person is identified as having planted anything. (Source)
Hundreds of students, parents, and attendees were recording on their phones at the UVU event. (Source)
Seeking footage of older men with long hair tied in a ponytail or bun from the UVU event. (Source)
Footage from Charlie Kirk’s left side (facing the crowd) is a total black hole and missing. (Source)
Seeking clips from 10 minutes before the shots or during the immediate chaos after. (Source)
The account says TPUSA has not released its full 4K/5K recordings of the UVU event and characterizes that as a refusal. TPUSA has not been shown to be under any obligation to release them. (Source)
A drone was overhead at Charlie Kirk’s UVU event on September 10, 2025. (Source)
fox13now.com CCTV footage showed the person of interest walking towards UVU campus at 11:49 AM, arriving on campus at 11:52 AM. (Source)
The suspect confessed in a Discord group chat before surrendering. (Source)
Posts alleging withheld flight logs, drone footage, sealed warrants, or agency interference describe records the Charlie Kirk Investigation Laws are designed to force into the open.
See also the podcast profile. On X specifically: multi-hundred-thousand-view posts on alleged second roof figure, Mauser safety/scope conflict in prosecution photos, Twiggs Dremel DNA claim, and Neiman family motion for prompt probable-cause ruling. Treat video interpretations as unverified until independent frame analysis and official exhibits are public.
This image is a screenshot of a social media post on X (formerly Twitter) by the user "Project Constitution" (@ProjectConstitu). Full write-up →This image is a digital screenshot of a post on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter) by the user "Project Constitution". Full write-up →This is a digital screenshot of a social media post on X (formerly Twitter) by the user "Project Constitution". Full write-up →This is a screenshot of a post on X (formerly Twitter) by the user "Project Constitution." The post presents a conspiracy theory or investigative claim regarding a shooting incident, questioning police movements on a… Full write-up →This is a digital screenshot of a post on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter) by the user "Project Constitution" (@ProjectConstitu). Full write-up →Here is a hyper-detailed factual description of the image. Full write-up →This is a digital screenshot of a post on X (formerly Twitter) by the account "Project Constitution." The post features a detailed text update claiming to share newly uncovered home surveillance footage related to… Full write-up →This is a digital screenshot of a social media post on X (formerly Twitter) by the user "Project Constitution" (@ProjectConstitu). Full write-up →This image is a composite screenshot of a social media post on X (formerly Twitter) by the user "Project Constitution". Full write-up →This image is a digital screenshot of a post from the social media platform X (formerly Twitter). Full write-up →This image is a digital screenshot of a post from X (formerly Twitter) by the user "Project Constitution" (@ProjectConstitu). Full write-up →This is a digital screenshot of a post from the social media platform X (formerly Twitter) published by an account named "Project Constitution". Full write-up →
Eleven Seconds From the Front RowAn 11-second clip published as brand-new HD footage shot from the front row at UVU, carrying the final question, the answer and the instant the event ends.
0:11
Two Accounts Of The Drone Request, Side By SideA 1:01 commentary clip placing a TPUSA statement that drone and roof coverage were denied next to Frank Turek's on-stage recollection of watching drone footage with…
