Restrictd_Truth — X Posts
@Restrictd_Truth is cited on the site for one theory post about the scene chaos immediately after the shot. It is recorded as an unverified X theory.
Claims from X posts
- In an October 2025 post, theorized that George Zinn — the man who shouted "I shot him — now shoot me!" — was performing a shouted diversion to aid the shooter's escape. The site logs this on UVU Social Media Response and in the Miscellaneous Evidence Leads table as unverified.
Investigative value
The Zinn-diversion framing is one of several competing readings of the immediate post-shot confusion, in which Zinn was detained and later cleared of the shooting itself. The site records the theory with attribution; it asserts no coordination by Zinn or anyone else.
Related
Interesting In This Area
- The two-patsies reading names both arrested men as expendable.
- A second account calls the outburst a distraction and the killing planned.
- A four-actor roster added a bicyclist carrying an air rifle.
- Crowd-figure identifications rest entirely on anonymous facial matching.
Interesting In Other Areas
- He was cleared of the shooting and later explained why he shouted.
- Distraction claims are compiled as unproven allegations, every one.
- UVU's own posts do not line up cleanly with the mainstream timeline.
- The leftover leads include this diversion theory, marked unverified.
Images












Other Pages In This Section
The scene-hardscaping question, amplified: ground material reportedly hauled away, then an "emergency directive" narrative about finishing by Monday. Work orders and directives are the records that would settle who ordered it and why.
Read this
A rare page where the subject's own words sit beside the claims made about him. Anonymous facial matching attached three different names to one crowd figure; he says he is terrified for his family and that he did not cheer.
Read thisAmong the first accounts to broadcast the father-assisted turn-in, which fixed the public chronology of the surrender inside forty-eight hours. That baseline is what every later custody-timeline argument measures against.
Read thisThe camera behind Charlie's head faced both the wound and the rooftop line, and its card reportedly left the scene within five minutes. Who took it and where it went are precise, answerable chain-of-custody questions.
Read thisElsewhere In The Investigation

George Zinn — the "Shoot Me" Man
The first person taken into custody shouted words to the effect of "I shot him, now shoot me," and later told police he said it to draw attention from the real shooter. He was cleared as the shooter the same day.
Read this
Alleged Patsies and Distraction Actors (Claims)
If a sophisticated operation killed Charlie Kirk, some of the people who drew the cameras were not the killer. This page compiles those distraction claims — every one an unproven allegation, none a finding of guilt.
Read this
UVU Social Media and Public Statements
UVU's own posts on September 10 set against the mainstream timeline in a fact-check table — the timings do not line up cleanly. It also carries the reported request to a witness to delete his footage.
Read thisThe threads belonging to no single section — sealed warrants, a badge-access list updated the day after, Google Trends hits from foreign addresses, a diversion-shout theory. Each is a lead with a source attached, and most are unverified. Collected here so cross-cutting items stop getting lost.
Read thisThis website's author is @HolonCitizen on X and YouTube/@HolonCitizen. Follow me there.
Interesting
- A charred SUV interior is combustion damage no passing rifle round explains.
- One X account alleges the autopsy sign-off happened while the report was still an editable draft.
- Sharing autopsy images became a brand-new Utah crime four months before the killing.