sj27426 — X Posts
@sj27426 is one of the circulating accounts behind the rear-camera SD card claim — a core item in the footage-handling questions the site tracks. The bullets below are claims attributed to their X posts (alongside @blesamerica and @Uncommonsince76), not verified findings.
Claims from X posts
- The camera positioned behind Charlie Kirk's head — facing the wound and the rooftop line — reportedly had its SD card/chip removed within about five minutes of the shot. See SD Cards and Cameras Removed.
- TPUSA has stated, according to reports, that the card was removed at police instruction or to prevent theft of the equipment — the innocent explanation is recorded alongside the claim.
- The claim is cited for context on the hospital security cameras page as part of a wider pattern of footage reportedly deleted, edited, or withheld elsewhere in the case — not a claim about the hospital itself.
- Related commentary (attributed to others on the same pages) names AV personnel and describes a staged "mechanical issue" before the shot — unverified social-media identifications of living people, presented as allegation only.
Investigative value
The rear camera would have held the most direct footage of the wound moment and the rooftop line; whether its recording exists, who took the card, and where it went are precise, answerable chain-of-custody questions. The point of preserving the claim is not to assign guilt but to document that footage-handling questions arose immediately and repeatedly.
Related
Interesting In This Area
- @SelinaAnneXX asks who held the low close vantage the tight crop came from.
- @Sunny61120 questions exported stairwell frames; @TPostMillennial reports enhanced video never broadcast.
- @TPV_John and @TheDibsterX allege the transport SUV's carpet was removed.
- @tsorama shares a tip disputing how one body camera reportedly stopped recording.
Interesting In Other Areas
- Cameras and SD cards were reportedly taken from the scene before any evidence seal.
- Hospital security cameras were reportedly seized, inside and outside, within hours.
- The camera inventory shows how many angles existed and how few were released.
- Footage preservation is the whole argument: what was recorded, and what survives.
Other Pages In This Section
The strongest form of the coordination reading of George Zinn's on-scene false confession — that it was a designed distraction inside a well-planned operation. Zinn's obstruction is court record; whether anyone arranged it is not, and both positions sit side by side here.
Read this
The main public source for the Fort Huachuca search-pattern lane: a dated list of geo-associated image searches for security, TPUSA-communications and intelligence figures, allegedly ramping into a September 6–9 cluster. Presented as possible pre-meeting coordination, and independently confirmed by nobody.
Read thisThe most-cited citizen reconstruction of the manhunt clock — a custody announcement near 4:21 PM, a weapon found around 5:40, a release at 5:59 — and the inference that the wider search paused inside that window. No full FBI minute log has been released, so it stays an inference.
Read thisThe amplification that carried the ATF inconclusive-comparison story out of a court filing and into mass audiences in March 2026, in tabloid shorthand. Citizen investigators call the result the load-bearing fracture in the Mauser narrative; the technical claim underneath is narrower than the headline.
Read thisElsewhere In The Investigation

Cameras and SD Cards Removed From the Scene (Claims)
Reported claims that production AV staff, not police, pulled camera SD cards and unhooked cameras before any evidence seal. Kirk's own microphone audio has still never been released.
Read this
Nearly the whole public case for the accused's movements is built from cameras — doorbells, campus CCTV, crowd phones, production rigs, travel-stop recorders. This is the device-by-device index.
Read thisHospital Security Cameras Removed
A hospital that size runs cameras, and not one frame from September 10 has been released. The page is careful about what it is: an open question and a demand for footage, not a finding that anything was removed.
Read thisEvidence & Footage Preservation
Low-resolution roof video was released while higher-fidelity campus archives reportedly stayed in. The same page tracks the reported requests that witnesses delete their own phone video and the disposal of the transport SUV.
Read thisInteresting
- An account posted leaked aerial imagery of the courtyard, taken by survey aircraft N59906.
- A judge reportedly ordered transport for an inmate with no known link to the case.
- A GRAMA reply said no arrest, yet Provo court documents reportedly show one.
This website's author is @HolonCitizen on X and YouTube/@HolonCitizen. Follow me there.