STARFORCEHH — X Posts
@STARFORCEHH (posting as Freemason) authored one of the most-shared geometric arguments against the rooftop-shot account, preserved in the site's ballistics photo cluster. The bullets below are claims attributed to their X posts — reasoning from second-hand medical descriptions, since the autopsy is not public.
Claims from X posts
- Citing "new medical data," the post states the bullet entered Charlie Kirk's neck at C2, obliterated C3 through C7, and lodged in T1; that Kirk was leaning slightly forward, struck slightly left of the Adam's apple.
- Argues that with a gradual ten-degree downward angle from the Losee Center roof at the range attributed to Tyler Robinson, entry should have been around C7 or T1 — concluding a C2 entry is "mathematically impossible" and that the official story "has become nothing more than a tall tale." (Full-screen capture)
- A visible reply from a nurse account argues the opposite — that the bullet hit the edge of body armor and ricocheted upward — and the site preserved the composite precisely because it captures both sides in one frame. (Thread capture)
Investigative value
The argument is purely geometric and can only be tested against actual autopsy measurements, which remain sealed — the recurring problem with every trajectory claim in the case. The structured version of this dispute lives at Wound Trajectory Angle and Trajectory and Wound Mismatch.
Related
- Autopsy Report Not Public
- Photos: Ballistics and the Gun
- robertcalliste1 (Valhalla VFT clips)
- ShekandaPeoples (ATF explainer)
Interesting In This Area
- @themarketswork shared a sniper reading placing the shot behind Charlie's right side.
- @ShekandaPeoples explains why the ATF could neither identify nor exclude the rifle.
- @stratagemmer reports the autopsy entered into evidence while its report stayed sealed.
- @TheQuartering warns that inconclusive gets flattened into no match by headlines.
Interesting In Other Areas
- Wound trajectory angle is where this geometry argument is set out properly.
- Trajectory and wound mismatch reaches the same doubt from the medical end.
- The injuries quoted in the filing are the only public measurements anyone has.
- The roof section carries the other half: whether anyone fired from there at all.
Images


Other Pages In This Section

Within hours of the shooting this account posted that N888KG left Provo, dropped off ADS-B thirty minutes out, and came back. The capture predates the owner's pre-scheduled-round-trip explanation, so readers can see the sequence: observation first, explanation afterwards.
Read thisThe capability half of the Israel argument — the 2024 supply-chain pager operation, PETN inside device batteries, and the reach that demonstrates. This site flags on every page that capability in another theatre is not evidence of action in Utah, which is why the account is quoted rather than endorsed.
Read thisA widely recirculated sniper analysis that contradicts both camps at once: not a .30-06, fired from slightly behind Charlie's right, and with a visible exit wound. The clearest reminder that early video-based ballistics readings diverge sharply and none of them replaces the sealed medical exam.
Read thisThe source of the strongest foreign-presence numbers in open-source threads — 44 foreign-registered phones near Charlie at the shot, sixteen of them Israeli, four later said to reappear in Islamabad. Also the least verifiable: no dataset, methodology or carrier record has ever been published.
Read thisElsewhere In The Investigation

A 5 to 9 degree downward shot from the Losee roof should meet face or jaw first. The reported entry sits between larynx and trachea, left of the spine — a far more straight-on path. The geometry is the argument.
Read thisThe argument that a rooftop .30-06 cannot match the reported neck wound path, the energy, or the blood evidence. It is the single thread connecting almost every cause-of-death dispute on this site.
Read thisThe hub for every roof claim — the alleged firing position, the lateral crawl, the clothing dispute and the egress. Start here if this page is your first roof page.
Read thisInteresting
- Why does the transport SUV interior look burned if a rifle round passed through a body?
- Researchers say "David Sprague" is a maiden-name alias — an attribution never confirmed.
- Circulated radio audio reportedly carries the order not to interview a key figure.
This website's author is @HolonCitizen on X and YouTube/@HolonCitizen. Follow me there.
