TriciaThom40938 — X Posts
@TriciaThom40938 contributes security-failure analogy commentary, placing the UVU event inside the frame of the Butler, Pennsylvania Trump assassination attempt. The comparison is commentary, not forensic proof that the same failure mode occurred at UVU.
Claims from X posts
- July 2026 — Compared UVU to Butler, PA: "signs were there" — cameras and known threats existed — yet security did not act before the shot. Catalogued on No Counter-Snipers as analogy commentary.
- Placed front-of-house screening failures in the same Butler-style frame: known threats plus surveillance coverage, yet suspicious pre-shot behavior (in the official Robinson narrative) was not stopped — see Screening and Credentials. The analogy does not prove any Q&A participant was part of a plot.
Investigative value
The Butler analogy is one of the recurring frames citizen investigators use to argue the UVU security posture was indefensible rather than merely unlucky: rooftops unsecured despite documented death threats, six campus officers for roughly 3,000 attendees, and no counter-sniper overwatch. This account's posts keep that comparative frame in circulation; the underlying staffing facts are developed on the Security Team pages.
Related
This website's author is @HolonCitizen on X and YouTube/@HolonCitizen. Follow me there.
Interesting
- One analyst argues the C2 neck entry is geometrically impossible from that roof.
- Citizens name the exact records to subpoena: 302s, dispatch audio, informant agreements.
- A judge reportedly ordered transport for an inmate with no case link, under a gag order.