Skip to main content
← Messages & Threats

The September 8 Donor Group Chat

This is the strongest-sourced message set in the entire investigation. Unlike the "kill me" messages, these were released as screenshots, reported by mainstream outlets, and publicly acknowledged as genuine by TPUSA's own spokesman.

What was released​

Candace Owens published messages from a nine-person group chat dated September 8, 2025 — two days before Charlie Kirk's death. Reporting describes the chat as running on WhatsApp and as including donors and figures in Kirk's orbit. The lines most widely quoted are:

"Just lost another huge Jewish donor. $2 million a year because we won't cancel Tucker."

"Jewish donors play into all the stereotypes. I cannot and will not be bullied like this. Leaving me no choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause."

Why the authentication matters​

TPUSA spokesman Andrew Kolvet has publicly confirmed the donor-related texts as genuine. That confirmation is what separates this page from every other page in this section. It means the following are not in dispute:

  • Kirk was under financial pressure from donors in the days before his death.
  • The pressure was tied to his refusal to cancel Tucker Carlson.
  • He described himself as being pushed toward stepping back from the pro-Israel cause.

What is not established by these messages is any threat of violence. The chat is about money and platform decisions. The escalation to "they're going to kill me" (KM-09) is reported for the next day and is documented separately on September 9 — "They Are Going To Kill Me".

What this does and does not prove​

It proves motive-adjacent context: a well-funded coalition was reportedly withdrawing support, and Kirk was reportedly considering a public break. It does not prove that any donor, organization, or country had anything to do with his death. Donors withdrawing funding over a booking dispute is ordinary politics. No named donor is accused here of anything, and none has been charged.

The chain that investigators draw — donor pressure on September 8, fear-of-death messages on September 9, assassination on September 10 — is a timeline, not a causal finding. Two of its three links are far better documented than the middle one.

Open questions​

  1. Have the full, unredacted screenshots of the nine-person chat been published anywhere?
  2. Who were the other eight participants, and has any of them spoken publicly?
  3. Which donor is referenced in the "$2 million a year" line, and has that person responded?
  4. Does the same chat contain any of the fear-of-death language reported for September 9?

The Rebuttal: Turek Says the Next Day Went the Other Way​

These texts are dated September 8. On September 9 — the day after, and the day before the assassination — Frank Turek says he sat in a room at TPUSA headquarters while Kirk convened a 50-minute Zoom call with two officials in Israel to ask how he could better defend Israel publicly. Turek's stated purpose in telling it is to rebut the reading of the chat on this page.

Both accounts can be true. A man can write in anger on Monday that donor blackmail is pushing him out of a coalition and sit down on Tuesday with people from that coalition to talk it through. What Turek adds is not a contradiction of the screenshots — Kolvet authenticated those — but a witness to what Kirk was still doing about it on his last full day alive.

Frank Turek, 53 seconds. Clip page: Turek on the Sept 9 Zoom. IPFS CID QmSWJ3kPpm6JfwanDp3tvXhm97e5SpRRimytvUZJCzXX4i.

"Charlie calls a meeting, a scheduled Zoom meeting, with two officials in Israel, one Jewish Defender of Israel in the United States. I'm in the room, with Charlie, Blake's in the room, Mikey's in and out… I was in this meeting. It lasted 50 minutes. This idea that Charlie was giving up on Israel is false."

— Frank Turek, in the clip above

Full analysis, the participant question, and the seven open questions: The September 9 Zoom Call With Israeli Officials.

Interesting In This Area​

Other Pages In This Section​

September 9 — "They Are Going To Kill Me"

Three people say Charlie told them, in his last twenty-four hours, that he thought he was about to be killed. No screenshot has been published, which is why it is the most consequential and least documented claim here.

Read this

Candace Owens' Threat Claims

The most serious and least corroborated allegations on this site — a foreign plot she says an anonymous source described to her, published, in her words, in case something happens to her. No document, no named source, no independent confirmation. It is recorded because a prominent figure said it publicly, not because it is established.

Read this
Screenshot of a long text message reportedly sent to Charlie Kirk

Laurie Cardoza-Moore's Message to Charlie Kirk

A long inbound rebuke, screenshotted and posted a year later, warning Charlie that God would lift His hand from him. It is one of the few messages in the record running toward him rather than out from him. Provenance is the posting account; nothing in it is independently authenticated.

Read this
Screenshot of a phone text thread labeled Seth, reading: He never said to me at least that he was bullied or threatened by anyone. just that saying certain things would come at a cost. He was right about that, but that doesn't make anyone that he was dealing with evil.

Seth Dillon's Text — "A Cost"

A published screenshot in which Dillon reportedly denies that Charlie was bullied or threatened, while confirming that saying certain things would come at a cost. The page separates what the image shows from what the poster says was said off-camera. They are not the same thing.

Read this

Sources​

  • Candace Owens' public release of the group-chat screenshots
  • Andrew Kolvet's public confirmation of the donor texts, cited in mainstream coverage
  • Master investigation file — "Quotes Charlies / Verified" and donor-chat sections

Best understanding of when this happened​

Best understanding: authenticated donor WhatsApp about leaving the pro-Israel cause falls in the ~48 hours before UVU, with packaging on SEPT 8 and later SEPT 9 re-dating claims. Not a kill-me string.

Date range (working model): SEPT 7–10 · ~48h WhatsApp · SEPT 8 vs SEPT 9 re-dating

The chart below is not a government finding. Bar height is relative likelihood from public claims. Domain is trimmed to non-trivial likelihood.

leave_pro_israel_whatsapp_48h — likelihood timeline

Commentator coverage: Citizen journalist Ian Carroll has questioned who the other participants in the nine-person chat were and what was discussed at the reported Hamptons donor meeting, while stressing according to his posts that donor friction raises "a perfectly reasonable question to ask" and does not establish that any donor or country was involved in Kirk's death.

Interesting​

  • The same two names appear in a religious rebuke sent to Kirk.
  • An "R2" exhibit suffix shows one recording becoming two clips with different timings.
  • Owens ties July 11 to a new CIA executive director announcement.
  • Paul Singer and the TPUSA donor network
  • Why motive keeps returning to policy
  • The Israel angle in the investigation
  • Tucker Carlson and the booking dispute
  • Compiled quotes and warnings table
  • The weeks before September 10