Skip to main content
← Mic — Exploding Mic Theory

"Get That Off Of Him" — Alleged 911 Call Audio Tip

On July 27, 2026, @DiligentDenizen posted a short clip in which Candace Owens presents what is described as an audio tip — a line reportedly captured on an alleged 911 call placed by Charlie Kirk's security team while they were en route to the hospital on September 10, 2025. The line, repeated twice on the clip, is: "get that off of him."

23-second clip of Candace Owens presenting the alleged 911 call audio tip. Source: @DiligentDenizen on X, July 27, 2026. IPFS CID Qmd61gsAViXZpkS8MADknnBcZfkRZcaGnMrpoXTf1j3pYn.

What the post said​

According to @DiligentDenizen, posted July 27, 2026 (477 likes, 96 reposts, 8,453 views):

‼️🇺🇸: @RealCandaceO reveals "GET THAT OFF OF HIM (Charlie)" audio tip of alleged 911 call from Charlie Kirk's security team on their way to the hospital on 9/10 👀

Get WHAT off of him? 🤔 His t-shirt? His MICROPHONE? 🤔

I'd love to see TPUSA answer this?!

The poster is not asserting what "that" refers to — the post is framed as an open question addressed to TPUSA.

Transcript​

The clip runs 23 seconds. Full transcript, as spoken:

"Allegedly — allegedly not for long. The statement, get that off of him. Get that off of him, is captured on this alleged 911 call. Now, get what off of him is the first thing I think. Get what off of him?"

The speaker's own framing is important: the word "allegedly" is used three times in 23 seconds, and the phrase "allegedly not for long" indicates the speaker expects further material to be released rather than claiming the recording is already authenticated.

Why this matters to the microphone thread​

The clip is short and carries no independent documentation, but the question it raises sits directly on top of the exploding-mic theory:

  • Charlie Kirk was wearing a RØDE Wireless PRO lavalier transmitter, reportedly routed under his shirt rather than over it — see AV Team and Mic Setup.
  • If a device was removed from his body before he reached the hospital, that would be a chain-of-custody event that no public record currently documents.
  • The same chain-of-custody question is raised independently on the Table Jumpers & Device page and by the June 2026 SUV interior photos, where a burnt object was photographed in the vehicle used to transport him.

Proponents of the mic theory read "that" as the transmitter. That is an interpretation, not something the audio establishes.

Ordinary explanations​

Several benign readings fit the same three words at least as well:

  • Clothing. Emergency responders routinely cut and strip clothing away from a trauma patient to expose the wound. "Get that off of him" is standard language in that context, and the post itself lists "his t-shirt" as the first possibility.
  • Equipment generally. A lanyard, badge, jacket, or the mic could all be in the way of chest compressions or a wound assessment without any of it being sinister.
  • A bystander or a blanket. The phrase does not specify an object at all.

None of these require any hidden device, and none imply wrongdoing.

How later commentary stretched the tip​

By early August 2026, public posts were already treating the phrase as settled evidence that a RØDE pack was stripped in the vehicle (sometimes joking that the only job was to keep an “explosive” from falling out on the way to the truck). Other speculative replies mapped the audio to an OnStar / open-door automatic 911 path or to a heart-rate monitor rather than a microphone. None of those elaborations authenticate the underlying recording. They show how a two-second alleged tip becomes a Rorschach for every device theory in this section — lapel pack, pendant, earpiece, or mundane medical gear.

What has not been established​

  • The 911 recording has not been publicly released by Utah County dispatch or any agency, and is not in the public court record.
  • The speaker is not identified, and it is not established who was on the call.
  • The clip presents an audio tip secondhand; the underlying file has not been independently authenticated, and this website has not verified it.
  • No wrongdoing by any member of Charlie Kirk's security detail, by TPUSA, or by any other named person or organization is established by this clip. Nothing on this page is a finding of fact.

Open questions​

  1. Will the full 911 audio be released, and by which agency?
  2. Does the UVU GRAMA record set or the criminal discovery file contain the dispatch recording?
  3. Does the timestamp of the call match the SUV's departure and arrival times documented on the SUV photos page?
  4. Has TPUSA responded to the question the post raises?

X.com posts:​

This website's author is @HolonCitizen on X and YouTube/@HolonCitizen. Follow me there.

More angles in this section​

The tip is secondhand and unauthenticated; it matters only as a pointer to what might have been removed. Device candidates are the RØDE Wireless PRO and, for a separate camp, the crucifix pendant—see mic vs pendant. Stage chaos that might show hands on hardware is under table jumpers and the missing device; who reportedly mic’d Kirk is on the AV team setup page. Transport-vehicle photos that investigators read for glass, plastic, and a charred object live on the SUV page. Whether fabric, soil, or upholstery ever got a public explosive swab is the subject of residue on fabric and the residue cover-up hub. Physics context for why anyone thinks a device was there at all is on the video analysis and Canon XA55 audio pages.

Interesting​