Skip to main content
← All Fed Slop Issues

41. Copyright strikes and smears against people collecting receipts

Attributed claims only

Nothing on this page claims as fact that TPUSA, Erika Kirk, the FBI, any platform, or any other person or organization acted illegally or improperly. Sending a legal letter or filing a copyright claim is a lawful act. This site makes no claim that Erika Kirk or TPUSA had any role in or knowledge of Charlie Kirk's death. Tyler Robinson is charged, not convicted, and presumed innocent.

The issue in plain words​

"Receipts" is the word citizen investigators use for primary material: 911 audio, restaurant staff accounts, flight data, campus video, court filings. Much of what the public knows about the gaps in this case came from ordinary people posting that material.

Some of those people report that their posts were taken down with copyright claims, that they received cease-and-desist letters, or that they were publicly labeled as cruel to the Kirk family. The question is whether this is the normal protection of a grieving family's rights, or a pattern that keeps evidence off the internet.

Side by side​

Fed Slop SideProtect the family's rights and stop monetized grave-dancing.
Citizen InvestigatorsInvestigators say takedowns hit the steakhouse audio, campus exclusives, and investigators' families, and that the process itself is part of the cover-up.

The fed slop side, in full​

A family that lost a husband and father in public has every right to control footage it owns, and to object when strangers monetize his death. Copyright claims and legal letters are the normal tools for that. Many channels built large audiences on this case, and some of the content was cruel, speculative, or simply wrong. On this view, a takedown is not suppression; it is a limit on profiting from grief, and critics who complain about it are protecting their revenue, not the truth.

Official-side commentators put it in moral language. They say Erika Kirk is a widow running TPUSA, that questioning her is harassment, and that the people posting steakhouse clips and campus exclusives are running a "Murder Industrial Complex." Accounts repeating the charging package treat Candace Owens as targeting friends of the family. They say a non-disparagement clause Owens once signed, and the likeness of Charlie Kirk himself, give the organization a clean legal basis to send letters. From this chair, a DMCA notice is housekeeping. A cease-and-desist is what any estate would send. The receipts the other side wants are, on this view, already in the charging file.

What citizen investigators say​

Investigators say the takedowns do not fall on the cruel content. They say they fall on the receipts. They point to the Panguitch thread: staff at Cowboy's Smokehouse, about 209 miles south of Orem, say they served the accused dinner that night and gave the FBI the last four digits of the card. A later account reports the owner saying the FBI told the restaurant not to answer further questions. Investigators say recordings tied to that account, and campus exclusives, are among the material that drew claims and removals. This site has not seen every takedown notice. The ones that have been shown in public are specific.

Project Constitution posted a dated sequence. A March 2026 Hollywood Reporter piece recorded a cease-and-desist to the person behind that channel, after earlier letters to video podcaster Zach De Gregorio and to Owens. On June 11, 2026, the same channel published what it said was a third letter, this one from counsel at Faegre Drinker, demanding it stop using Charlie Kirk's name, image, likeness, voice, video, or audio. The original memorial profile photo, the poster said, was a Gage Skidmore photograph released under an irrevocable Creative Commons license. The poster says he replaced it anyway. On July 29, 2026, he reported a DMCA copyright claim that locked the account over the picture he said he had already taken down. On August 3 he reported a second, nearly identical notice against a fully AI-generated replacement image. He says he filed counter-notices, that X Legal Support then wrote that the account was not in violation, and that a fourth cease-and-desist followed anyway. Those are his reports and the letters he displayed. They are not a court finding that anyone filed in bad faith.

Owens is on a parallel track. In January 2026 she published portions of a TPUSA letter telling her to stop saying the organization knew about the killing, took part in it, or covered it up. Counsel cited a prior December 2 letter and video calls on December 4 and December 15. This site makes no claim that Erika Kirk or TPUSA knew of or took part in the killing. The letters exist as public artifacts because Owens and others put them on camera.

The site documents other pressure of the same kind. Its TPUSA Legal Threats page records the reported drone-footage letter to Wolves and Finance, while noting these are ordinary corporate tools. A security-detail member has also filed a defamation suit against Candace Owens, which investigators read as raising the cost of asking questions. The censorship-of-investigators page and the YouTube and Meta page collect creator reports of age restrictions, demonetization, and strikes. X deboosting and engagement bans around Owens posts sit in the same climate. Witness-footage pressure is the campus version of the same question: who decides which clips stay up.

The investigators' larger point is about process. A copyright claim can remove a post in hours, with no judge and no public hearing, and the burden is then on the poster to fight it. They say that if the same process keeps landing on witness material, the process itself becomes part of how the record shrinks. The Archive.today subpoena is the archival twin of that fight: the one hard-to-delete mirror investigators rely on.

When this fight ran​

  • December 2025 – January 2026. Official-side commentators treated Owens's Kirk coverage as an attack on the widow. TPUSA's January 2026 cease-and-desist to Owens, as she published it, is the first widely read legal letter in this lane.
  • March 2026. A third reported letter, to Project Constitution, landed in trade press. Official-side accounts framed it as the start of real lawsuits against people spreading false claims about Erika Kirk.
  • June 11, 2026. The third Project Constitution letter, as posted, demanded a total ban on Charlie's name and image on that channel.
  • July 29 – August 7, 2026. DMCA notices, counter-notices, and a public claim that X Legal Support found no violation. This is the stretch investigators call "lawfare on the receipts."
  • September 2026. Project Constitution said it was on day ten of no monetization while covering the UVU notice of claim. Official-side accounts kept the "grave-dancing / digital assassin" line running through the one-year mark.

Why it matters for Tyler Robinson​

The Panguitch receipt goes to where Tyler Robinson was on the evening of September 10, 2025. The Panguitch chain is one of the cheapest public checks on the State's Orem-at-9:00-p.m. texts. If the people collecting that kind of material are removed, sued, or labeled, the one check on the State's timeline disappears. A defendant presumed innocent needs witnesses and records to stay findable. That is why this issue sits next to Proof Not Tyler and Tyler Robinson is not the assassin: the physical case is only as public as the clips that survive.

What would settle it​

  • Publication of each takedown notice: who filed it, under what claim, and for which specific file.
  • Whether any claimant actually owned the material, or claimed recordings made by third parties.
  • The full text of the reported cease-and-desist letters, including the June 11, 2026 Faegre Drinker letter and the January 2026 Owens letter, as complete PDFs rather than on-camera stills.
  • Whether the FBI gave the Panguitch restaurant any written instruction, and what it said.
  • Platform logs showing which strikes hit steakhouse audio and campus exclusives versus which hit commentary or memorial photos.

Read more on this site​