Blake Haruff
Disclaimer: Inclusion on this page does not imply that this individual had knowledge of, participated in, or committed any illegal or immoral act. This page documents their publicly known connection to the events of September 10, 2025 for investigative reference only.
Blake Haruff — widely nicknamed "Gibby" in event footage threads — is identified in public commentary and reporting as a close-proximity security figure who reportedly helped carry Charlie Kirk after the September 10, 2025 shooting. Analyses of courtyard video note significant blood visible on his clothing during the response, placing him among the responders with the most direct physical contact with Kirk in the first minutes. Haruff is a key member of the carry team with Alex Faria and Laine Schoenberg, distinct from but adjacent to the SUV core led by Brian Harpole.
Background
Haruff appears in public witness listings under "other security in close proximity" for the UVU event. Public commentary cross-references crowd descriptions of a "light blue plaid shirt" figure as a possible visual match for "Blake Harruff" — a spelling variant seen in some posts, not an official name confirmation.
Unlike Pierce Beck (Shaffer Security Group alumni) or the Integrity Security principals, Haruff's pre-event biography is sparsely documented in mainstream sources. His public profile is built from footage-visible actions and roster placement.
Connection to September 10, 2025
According to public reporting and citizen commentary on security threads:
- Haruff helped carry Kirk from the stage/courtyard area immediately after the ~12:23 PM shot.
- Significant blood was visible on him during the response, as documented in event footage and X posts — consistent with direct wound contact during the carry.
- He appears in chaos-aftermath footage analyses mapping personnel movement from stage toward the black SUV.
- Public commentary treats "Blake (aka Gibby)" as likely referring to Blake Haruff when cross-referencing blood-visible carry figures.
- He is listed among witnesses defense commentary argues should testify for a complete timeline — legal opinion, not an accusation.
X.com / Citizen Commentary (Attributed)
Per public posts and footage breakdowns discussed online:
- "Gibby" / blood-visible carry: Haruff named with Faria and Schoenberg as carry-team members; blood on clothing highlighted in citizen frame-by-frame posts.
- Plaid-shirt identification: Some threads label a light-blue-plaid responder as Haruff — crowd-sourced visual ID, unverified against an official roster.
- Distinction from Brian Harpole: Commentary stress Blake Haruff is not Brian Harpole (security chief, SUV occupant) despite shared surname confusion in early posts.
- Forensic preservation questions: Threads ask whether blood on Haruff's clothing was sampled or tested — listed as a potential future disclosure under Fix overview laws. No claim he obstructed investigation.
- Lower conspiracy targeting than SUV crew: Haruff appears more in witness-reconstruction discourse than in shaped-charge or Pero-device threads focused on Rick Cutler.
Investigative Questions
- What was Haruff's security assignment and staging position before Kirk was shot?
- What is his account of the carry sequence and of the moment the SUV team took over?
- Does official documentation confirm "Gibby" as Haruff versus other Blake-named personnel on site?
- Was blood/DNA from his clothing preserved in the criminal case file?
- How does his testimony correlate with Faria, Schoenberg, and SUV occupants' timelines?
Deeper Coverage
- Security Team Overview
- Witnesses Overview
- Medical Overview
- Alex Faria
- Laine Schoenberg
- Videos Overview
Status: Alive
Laws (Charlie Kirk)
- Haruff's FBI Form 302 interview report and untested blood and DNA from the response and removed hospital and UVU camera footage are things that the Charlie Kirk Investigation Laws may result in powerful truths coming out that aren't out yet.
Public Commentary on X (Attributed)
:::caution Context Only Nothing here is a finding that Blake Haruff (“Gibby”) committed any crime or knew of any crime in advance. Claims are attributed to public speakers or records discussion. :::
- Close-proximity security who reportedly helped carry Kirk; commentary notes significant visible blood during the response, discussed for its potential value as eyewitness and scene detail.
Interesting In This Area
- Dan Flood headed security and was one of five people in the SUV.
- Blaine Holt reportedly rejected the spine-impact explanation on Newsmax.
- Butch Hibbs is grouped with aftermath commentary rather than accused of anything.
- Candace Owens published the SUV photographs taken after that carry.
Interesting In Other Areas
- The clothing worn closest to Charlie is what residue testing works on.
- There was no ambulance and no sirens, just a private vehicle.
- The protective detail was contracted, and the plan reportedly failed several ways.
- The first ten minutes seed nearly every dispute in this case.
Other Pages In This Section
A producer who said publicly that he witnessed Mikey McCoy's calls — set against a 12:24:02 frame that appears to show McCoy alone. Either the frame or the memory is wrong, and both are on the record.
Read thisA co-owner of Hardscape Specialties LLC, named in unverified commentary about post-event paving in the courtyard. The paving question itself is real and unresolved; his involvement in anything improper is not alleged.
Read thisShe reportedly put the Hamptons meeting to Seth Dillon under oath, and commentary says his account shifted afterwards. Asking a question in a proceeding is an ordinary act; what it reportedly produced is why this page exists.
Read thisA Peak Prosperity analyst whose ballistics breakdown argues the wounding pattern fits a fragmenting high-velocity 9mm rather than the .30-06 of the official account. His stated opinion, attributed to him, and one reason the weapon question stays open.
Read thisElsewhere In The Investigation
FBI Seized Clothing From Charlie's Security Team
The clothing worn by the people closest to Kirk in the minutes after the shot is exactly the substrate residue testing works on. Whether it was ever tested is the question; the claim itself is secondhand and unverified.
Read this
No ambulance, no sirens — carried into a private vehicle by his own detail. Using the car already on hand in a chaotic scene is not evidence of wrongdoing, which is why the page is about who controlled the evidence, not about rescue.
Read this
The private protective detail responsible for Charlie Kirk at UVU — the contracted firm, the people on it, and the reported failures in the protection plan.
Read this
Immediate Aftermath: 10 Minutes After the Shot (12:23–12:33 PM MDT)
The ten minutes from the shot to the hospital doors, second by second, where nearly every enduring dispute in this case is seeded. Every source in the window disagrees with the others.
Read thisThis website's author is @HolonCitizen on X and YouTube/@HolonCitizen. Follow me there.
Interesting
- A claim alleges an unqualified stranger signed the autopsy before it was finished.
- A bomb scare at the closer hospital is offered as why the SUV drove past it.
- The hospital's new CEO started sixteen days before the shooting.