Carrie Prejean Boller
:::caution Legal Disclaimer Nothing on this page constitutes a finding of wrongdoing, criminal conduct, ethical violation, or participation in any crime by Carrie Prejean Boller or any other living person. This site documents questions and claims that have circulated in public commentary — not findings of fact. All persons named are presumed innocent. Allegations referenced here are unproven and have not been established in any court. :::
Carrie Prejean Boller is a public figure whose name enters case-adjacent discussion through online commentary reporting that she questioned Seth Dillon under oath about a so-called "Hamptons meeting."
Connection to the Charlie Kirk Case
According to circulating online commentary, Prejean Boller "asked Seth Dillon, while he was under oath, about the infamous Hamptons meeting with Charlie Kirk." This site documents that reported exchange as part of the broader donor-meeting and Israel-friction discussion, not as evidence of any wrongdoing by any party. The nature, forum, and accuracy of the reported questioning are not independently verified here.
Reported Claims (Unverified)
- Online commentary states she posed questions, under oath, regarding a reported Hamptons meeting tied to donor-circle discussions. (Attribution: social-media commentary; not confirmed by court transcript on this site.)
- Innocent/neutral framing: asking questions in a legal proceeding is an ordinary act and implies nothing about guilt or wrongdoing by anyone involved.
Open Questions
- In what proceeding, if any, did this questioning occur, and does a public transcript exist to confirm the reported account?
Status
Status: Alive
Citizen Investigator Claims and Public Commentary
(The following are attributed claims and file notes — not findings of criminal guilt.)
Hamptons Meeting Questioning (Attributed)
According to circulating X and commentary notes compiled in the investigation file, Carrie Prejean Boller publicly questioned Seth Dillon under oath about the reported Hamptons meeting connected to Charlie Kirk's evolving Israel-donor tensions. File summaries claim Dillon's account shifted toward admitting a "heated and at times spirited" exchange.
These are attributed reports of sworn or public questioning, not independent proof of what was said at any private meeting. See Israel Hamptons and Charlie — Israel, Donors, and Motive. No wrongdoing is alleged against Prejean Boller for asking questions.
File Notes Excerpt Context
…h. Thoughts, comments, and speculation down below, the more eyes and theories the better. ========== Hamptons Meeting =========================== Carrie Prejean Boller just asked Seth Dillon, while he was under oath, about the infamous Hamptons meeting with Charlie Kirk. And…
…omments, and speculation down below, the more eyes and theories the better. ========== Hamptons Meeting =========================== Carrie Prejean Boller just asked Seth Dillon, while he was under oath, about the infamous Hamptons meeting with Charlie Kirk. And now his story …
Claims on this page are attributed and remain unproven unless independently documented.
Interesting In This Area
- Seth Dillon, Josh Hammer and Natasha Hausdorff are named among reported Hamptons attendees.
- CJ Pearson and Emily Wilson appear in photographs from that same weekend.
- Candace Owens supplied most of the public account of that meeting.
- Charlie Kirk reportedly declined a very large funding offer afterwards.
Interesting In Other Areas
- The Hamptons page separates what attendees have confirmed from what they have not.
- Donor pressure sits at the centre of the geopolitical motive theories.
- Charlie reportedly wrote that breaking away would get him killed.
- The July 20 military and foreign-leaders meeting preceded Bridgehampton by about two weeks.
Other Pages In This Section
A Deputy Utah County Attorney on the prosecution team, documented by docket entry and public role only. Watch the office rather than the man: discovery disputes and gag-order fights run through it.
Read thisA Deputy Utah County Attorney found in civil contempt in June 2026 over pretrial media statements about "ample evidence" — reportedly made while an ATF ballistics result was inconclusive. The finding concerns publicity rules, not guilt.
Read thisCredited in commentary with the claim that EMS were "nowhere to be found" at UVU — a characterisation the same compiled notes say video contradicts. A disputed remark, recorded as disputed.
Read thisOne of the deputy county attorneys whose notice of appearance sits in the docket, and little more. The roster is worth knowing, because discovery fights get argued by name.
Read thisElsewhere In The Investigation
The Bridgehampton gathering of early August 2025, and what people present say was asked of Charlie Kirk. Attendance is documented; pressure is alleged.
Read this
Donor & Pre-Event Meeting Circle
Everyone public commentary places at the summer 2025 donor weekend, in one table, each marked with what is claim and what is verified. No court record in this repository proves the meeting occurred or who attended.
Read thisKM-03 — They Will Kill Me If I Break Away
Instance KM-03 in the numbered fear index, dated August 13 and rated tier B/C — widely repeated, no primary record. Numbered so the same claim carries the same link everywhere.
Read this
Geopolitical and Intelligence‑Service Motive Theories (Claims)
Motive frameworks arguing the killing required capabilities beyond a lone gunman — foreign-policy stakes, aircraft movements, and a blocked counterterrorism probe. No court has attributed the killing to any intelligence service.
Read thisSources
- Social-media commentary referenced in the investigation notes; see Israel — Hamptons and Donor Meeting Circle. Reported claim is unverified.
This website's author is @HolonCitizen on X and YouTube/@HolonCitizen. Follow me there.
Interesting
- Two versions of the final-question footage reportedly do not match.
- One eyewitness said chest on FOX 13, then neck on KSL.
- In a recorded jail call, the scene's confessor describes prior TPUSA work.