Skip to main content
← People

Judge Derek P. Pullan

:::caution Legal Disclaimer Nothing on this page constitutes a finding of wrongdoing, criminal conduct, ethical violation, or participation in any crime by Judge Derek P. Pullan or any other living person. This site documents questions and claims that have circulated in public commentary — not findings of fact. All persons named are presumed innocent. Allegations referenced here are unproven and have not been established in any court. :::

Derek P. Pullan is a Utah judge in the Fourth Judicial District Court. His name appears in the case caption for the criminal prosecution arising from the September 10, 2025 shooting at Utah Valley University.

Connection to the Charlie Kirk Case​

According to court records reproduced in this site's discovery materials, Judge Derek P. Pullan is the judge listed for State of Utah v. Tyler Alexander Robinson, Case No. 251403576, Fourth Judicial District Court, Utah County. His role is that of the presiding judicial officer in the state criminal matter.

His inclusion here is purely procedural and public-record based. Nothing on this page suggests any impropriety by Judge Pullan.

Background​

Public information identifies him as a sitting Utah state district court judge. Additional biographical detail is omitted where it cannot be reliably confirmed.

Open Questions​

  1. What pretrial rulings and scheduling decisions will shape the public's access to evidence in the Robinson case?
  2. Which motions (for example, camera-access and evidence-exclusion motions) come before the court?

Status​

Status: Alive

Citizen Investigator Claims and Public Commentary​

(The following are attributed claims and file notes — not findings of criminal guilt.)

Judicial / Court-Process Name​

Public notes associate Judge Derek P. Pullan with Utah court process in related proceedings. Document judicial role from dockets; do not allege case-fixing without court-record support.

Interesting In This Area​

Interesting In Other Areas​

Other Pages In This Section​

This is a composite digital screenshot collage containing several images from the social media platform X (formerly Twitter).

Donald Trump

Cited in commentary over a reported Epstein-files phone call and over the early single-shooter framing. Documented with attribution; no assertion of knowledge or involvement is made here.

Read this

EksAyn Anderson

A front-row attendee identified by citizen researchers, grouped with the general witnesses rather than with staff. The seat is the point — front-row allocation is a question of its own.

Read this

Eric Bolling

The broadcaster whose name turns up inside the search-spike lists compiled by anonymous researchers. Being searched for is not doing anything, and this page exists to keep that straight.

Read this
This is a digital graphic banner or video thumbnail depicting an investigative, conspiracy-style expose titled "UTAH MORMON MAFIA EXPOSED: HENDERSON • QURESHI TIES." The graphic…

Gina Romney Henderson

The Bilt executive whose surname supplies the "Romney" in an entire coincidence thread. A shared last name is not evidence, and the thread's own authors call it speculation.

Read this

Elsewhere In The Investigation​

Judge Tony F. Graf Jr.

The judge presiding over State v. Robinson, sworn in weeks before the shooting, in what commentary calls his first case on the bench. Appointment timing is an open question in posts, not a court finding.

Read this

Court Gag Orders

A gag order issued on the court's own motion, requested by neither side, restricting what parties and counsel may say. Lawful censorship, and a shaping force on everything published since.

Read this
This high-angle, close-up photograph displays a matte black, pocket-sized folding mechanical device—resembling a folded LifeCard single-shot pistol—resting on a weathered wooden…

Hearings Closed, No Transcripts Released (Claims)

Media barred, no transcripts issued, later sessions ordered closed as well. The page rates the claim EMERGING and says outright that closing a session is lawful and is not sealing a record forever.

Read this
This image is a digital screenshot or scan of a printed page from a legal document, likely a motion or brief filed in a court of law.

Discovery Rights Reform

Federal agencies sit outside the state prosecutor's Brady duty, so evidence they hold can stay unreachable. The fix names them custodial parties and puts clocks on it: 30 days to respond, 60 to review classification, 90 for judicial review.

Read this

Sources​

  • State of Utah v. Tyler Alexander Robinson, Case No. 251403576, Fourth Judicial District Court, Utah County (case caption).
  • Discovery materials index: /laws/Discovery/.

This website's author is @HolonCitizen on X and YouTube/@HolonCitizen. Follow me there.

Interesting​