Skip to main content
← People

Tami Radabaugh

:::caution Legal Disclaimer Nothing on this page constitutes a finding of wrongdoing, criminal conduct, ethical violation, or participation in any crime by Tami Radabaugh or any other living person. This site documents questions and claims that have circulated in public commentary — not findings of fact. All persons and organizations named on this site are presumed innocent. Allegations referenced here are unproven and have not been established in any court. :::

Tami Radabaugh's name appears in this investigation only within unverified online commentary describing her as an associate reportedly seen in the company of Scott Lazerson and others at a gathering. This site does not endorse or detail that speculation.

Connection to the Charlie Kirk Case​

The sole basis for the mention is a claim that she was present with other named individuals in the period before September 10, 2025. Being seen with other people is not evidence of anything, and there is no evidence connecting Tami Radabaugh to the events of that day and no charges of any kind.

Open Questions​

  1. Is the reported association accurate, and does it have any bearing on the case at all?

Status​

Status: Unknown

Sources​

  • Unverified social-media commentary. Presented here without endorsement and with no accusation implied.

Note: This is a minimal entry. The name appears only in uncorroborated online speculation by association; no wrongdoing is alleged or established.

Public Commentary Context​

This section documents how Tami Radabaugh appears in Charlie Kirk assassination discussion. Nothing here is a finding of criminal guilt.

How the Name Enters the Record​

According to this site's index description: Tami Radabaugh is a name that appears in unverified online commentary only as a reported associate seen in the company of other individuals of interest.

Citizen investigators and media discuss hundreds of peripheral names — witnesses, staff, relatives, prosecutors, commentators, and people who only appear in search-trend or list compilations. Inclusion documents that the name is discussed, not that the person did anything wrong.

What Investigators Ask (Questions, Not Accusations)​

  1. Is there a primary source (court filing, on-the-record interview, authenticated video) tying this person to September 10, 2025, or only secondary social posts?
  2. If the person is a witness, staffer, or official, what scope of testimony or records would clarify the official timeline?
  3. Have debunkings or corrections been published that remove the name from serious inquiry?

Research Status​

Agent 7 (rows 473–550) captured CK_FILE excerpts and X/web context where available into the temporary research file under ~/T/_ck/grok/People/. Where research was thin, that is logged honestly — silence is not proof, and viral naming is not evidence.

Defamation Boundary​

Living persons are presumed innocent. Unverified "person of interest" list culture is recorded as a social phenomenon of the case, not adopted as the site's accusation.

Open Questions Raised by Investigators​

  1. What primary-source documents mention Tami Radabaugh in connection with UVU, TPUSA, or the Tyler Robinson prosecution?
  2. Has Tami Radabaugh issued any public statement about the case or about online speculation?
  3. Should this profile remain on the public index if no primary source ever appears — or be retained only as a negative result (name checked, nothing found)?

Documents and Threads to Watch​

  • Utah court filings and hearing transcripts in the Robinson matter
  • GRAMA / FOIA releases naming event staff, LE, or medical personnel
  • High-engagement X threads that introduce new primary video rather than recycled lists

This website's author is @HolonCitizen on X and YouTube/@HolonCitizen. Follow me there.

Interesting​