BFRC Handwritten Working Notes
What This Image Shows
This is the third and least formal of the three images: a page of the author's handwritten working notes, uncaptioned, with a red circle drawn on it and the word "stabilize" legible among writing that is otherwise difficult to read.
It is included on the site because completeness matters more than presentation. The post carried four pieces of media — an animated video with music and no narration, plus these three diagrams — and readers weighing the hypothesis are entitled to see all of it, including the part that shows the reasoning was worked out by hand rather than derived from instrumentation or measurement.
As published, the notes add no checkable content. No calculation, source, or measurement is legible.
This image is published on the site's Electrocution overview.
The B-Field Resonant Cascade (BFRC) hypothesis was posted on July 15, 2026 by the X account @wtshesaid72, self-described as an "artist, educator, inventor, and physics researcher." The site rates it SPECULATIVE: there is no field-strength figure, no current estimate, no generator specification, no calculation, no photograph of equipment at the venue, no procurement record, no witness, and no engineer on record endorsing it. Its load-bearing claim — that the internal injuries were inconsistent with ballistic trauma — cannot be checked while the autopsy remains sealed.
Read it against the alternatives at Electrocution, the BFRC hypothesis, the exploding-mic theory, the official .30-06 account, and Cause of Death.
Where This Image Appears
This image is used on the following investigation page:
Related Areas
- Cluster: Electrocution
- All photo evidence: Photos