Skip to main content
← Electrocution

BFRC Diagram — Claimed Resonant Site Geometry

Hand drawn cross section diagram of a courtyard stage and an underground cavity beneath it

What This Image Shows

This is the site-geometry cross-section, the first of three diagrams the author published with the hypothesis. It renders the venue in section: a bowl-shaped courtyard, a raised platform with what the author calls a deliberate air gap beneath it, and an underground high-voltage cavity said to be tapped from existing infrastructure, with a pulsed electromagnetic field generator connected and ready.

The drawing is where the argument does most of its work, because it converts ordinary venue features into deliberate preparations. Outdoor venues have service vaults and electrical runs. Stages are raised and hollow. Campus courtyards are enclosed by the buildings around them. Nothing in the diagram identifies an anomalous feature discovered at the site; it reinterprets normal ones.

This image is published on the site's Electrocution overview.

The B-Field Resonant Cascade (BFRC) hypothesis was posted on July 15, 2026 by the X account @wtshesaid72, self-described as an "artist, educator, inventor, and physics researcher." The site rates it SPECULATIVE: there is no field-strength figure, no current estimate, no generator specification, no calculation, no photograph of equipment at the venue, no procurement record, no witness, and no engineer on record endorsing it. Its load-bearing claim — that the internal injuries were inconsistent with ballistic trauma — cannot be checked while the autopsy remains sealed.

Read it against the alternatives at Electrocution, the BFRC hypothesis, the exploding-mic theory, the official .30-06 account, and Cause of Death.

Where This Image Appears

This image is used on the following investigation page:

More In This Cluster