Careful Rebuttal to an Election Fraud Book
What This Image Shows
A screenshot of a long post from an account shown as The Lone Raccoon, handle @FSociety_1942.
The post reads: "I am going to be as succinct and careful as I can in this response to the recent reporting by numerous online reporters about Ralph Pezzullo's recent book on the 2024 election. I welcome any discussion that leads more people to be convinced that election fraud occurs, and occurs regularly - and supports the truth that the only way to conduct fair elections is hand counted paper ballots cast in person on a single day of voting. However, here are my thoughts and, more importantly, questions which must be answered. 1. Venezuela bad. Smartmatic bad. Leading to Dominion Bad. Leading to Liberty Vote maybe bad. I have met with many of the same whistleblowers as the book's authors and others and have heard their stories and exchanged data. 2. Dominion moved its development to a team in Serbia. Bad. Terrible. I've written about this."
This is a rare artifact in the intake queue: someone inside a movement applying scrutiny to that movement's own claims, and numbering his objections. Whatever one makes of his premises, the method, demand the sourcing before accepting the conclusion, is the one this archive tries to apply to its own material. This is election material rather than case material. See Vote.
Related Areas
- Cluster: Unfiled Backlog
- All photo evidence: Photos
More In This Cluster
- Previous: Translated Post on the Released Detainee
- Next: Unfiled Backlog — Photo 254