Skip to main content
← Following

Erika Kirk's invitation to check her flight logs

This page is the on-camera statement, and the X posts that answered it. It is not a finding that Erika Kirk erased anything, boarded anything, or did anything wrong. Status: Alive. Parent: Erika Kirk's flights. The tracker-removal dispute is Erika Flight Logs Erased.

:::caution Legal Disclaimer Nothing on this page constitutes a finding of wrongdoing by Erika Kirk. Her words are quoted. Other accounts' replies are quoted as their allegations. Blocking a tail number from a public tracker is a lawful privacy step and implies nothing on its own. :::

What she said​

Transcribed from the clip @hurtfeelingzday posted on 21 July 2026 (9,474 likes, 211,641 views):

"You really think I'm going to be on an Egyptian plane while I am wanting to be with my In-N-Out burger and my chocolate milkshake? No, I'm not. So if you want to go through my flight log, go right ahead. It very boring. You say I was here on this date. I have a photo on my phone to prove that I actually was in the hospital, because I was having contractions. So game on."

Three moves in one answer, kept separate:

  1. Denial — she was not aboard the Egyptian-registered aircraft.
  2. Invitation — check the log of the jet she is associated with, N102DZ.
  3. Alibi for at least one contested date — hospital, contractions, a timestamped photo she says she has.

The video is also embedded on the erased-logs page. This page is the statement and the reply, not the tracker-removal mechanics.

How X answered the invitation​

@hurtfeelingzday, same post:

"Oh Erika Mossad Frantzve says we can check her flight logs of her jet N102DZ? The same flight logs that were ERASED in May 2026 from flightradar24 so now NOBODY can check them? But too late I & others have them. They are far from boring."

That is that account's allegation that the invitation points at a record that is no longer public, plus a claim of possession. The insult in the opening is the poster's, not this site's. Erika Kirk is named here as Erika Kirk.

The same account, @hurtfeelingzday, 24 June 2026 (4,613 likes), had already posted: "Erika Kirk deleted all of her flight data jet N102DZ (for all of 2025) a month before the prelim against Tyler Robinson." That sentence assigns the deletion to her as a fact. This site does not. Who requested a tracker block, if one occurred, is not in the public record this page holds. Owners, operators, and the FAA LADD program can all produce a public-history gap. Tyler Robinson is charged, not convicted; a preliminary-hearing date does not turn a tracker gap into evidence against anyone.

@hurtfeelingzday, 16 August 2026, later alleged that posting screen recordings of the 2025 data got the account "locked indefinitely," then restored after another user alerted media. That is the poster's account of an X-moderation event. It is not independent confirmation of the underlying logs.

@AdameMedia, 14 December 2025, and @Mia_Stretch the same day, alleged that she "exposed herself by denying something nobody said" — that Candace Owens had not claimed Erika was on the Egyptian jets. @thereallorilove, 30 December 2025: "Claim: Egyptian planes were following Erika Kirk. Erika: I was never on an Egyptian plane. I was pregnant. I like In-N-Out burgers." @Chris_CDC: "Why were Egyptian planes following you? Erika: 'chocolate ice cream.'"

Those posts are commentary on her answer, not evidence of a flight. A person is allowed to deny a nearby-jet story by saying she was not on the jet. Pregnancy across several of the cited periods is also her reported CBS-town-hall response, recorded on press coverage.

Counterargument​

  • The invitation is only as useful as the record it points at. If the public N102DZ history was blocked in May 2026, outsiders cannot take her up on it without the operator's logs or a pre-removal copy. That is a records problem, not a finding about her conduct.
  • Blocking a tail is ordinary. See the LADD note on N102DZ.
  • The hospital photo is a concrete, checkable rebuttal for whatever date it covers. It has not been published here, so it has not been tested here.
  • "Far from boring" is an opinion until the saved screenshots are produced as a dated table.

What we do not know​

Which contested date the contractions photo covers. Whether a FlightRadar24 removal in May 2026 can be confirmed against the live site. What the copies @hurtfeelingzday says he holds actually contain. Who, if anyone, filed the privacy request.