Skip to main content
← Proof Not Tyler

Trajectory & Wound Mismatch

Even if Tyler Robinson were on the Losee Center rooftop with a .30-06, citizen analysts argue the geometry and wound morphology do not fit a distant high-power rifle kill. Without a public autopsy, these are interpretations of video, witness quotes, and physics — not ME findings. Robinson is charged, not convicted. The mismatch is one of the main reasons the majority of citizen investigators now hold that Charlie Kirk was killed by a device at chest and neck level rather than by a round fired from 120 metres away.

Rooftop angle vs entry site​

CK_FILE and @_DaniFesto compile:

  • Shooter position ~120 m east, downward angle roughly 5–9 degrees
  • That trajectory would likely strike face or jaw first
  • Reported entry instead between larynx and trachea, left of cervical spine — more straight-on to the neck than a shallow downward rifle path from the east

If the neck wound were an exit from an internal device or close shot, rooftop Tyler becomes physically unnecessary — a core Proof Not Tyler argument.

Energy and visible damage​

Gun & Bullet notes .30-06 carries roughly 8× the muzzle energy of 9mm. Analysts expect:

  • Catastrophic tissue destruction at rifle distances
  • Prominent exit wound and heavy blood on white stage/tarp

Conflicting public claims include:

  • Treating doctor quote: bullet "did not exit" — called an "absolute miracle" (CK notes)
  • Candace Owens: no pooling near heart; blood sideways; shirt clean vs pre-scripted medic descriptions
  • Witness Nick trajectory descriptions vs rooftop line

Shirt timing on video​

Mic video analysis alleges shirt fabric movement before visible neck blood — argued as inconsistent with external rifle strike timing. Treat as frame-analysis claim pending raw footage release.

Alternative calibers fit better (hypothesis)​

ProjectConstitu / Dr. Chris Martenson threads argue 9mm +P-class cavitation explains necklace snap and pugilist pose without launching the body as .30-06 would. Alternative Kill Mechanisms routes tent and mic hypotheses.

Disclosure that would settle it​

  • Public autopsy with trajectory rods
  • High-resolution wound photography
  • Official ME entry/exit determination

Until then, trajectory mismatch remains a strong citizen-investigator pillar for doubting the rooftop .30-06 kill story.

Citizen Investigator Claims on X​

(Challenges to the lone-rooftop /.30-06 attribution — Robinson is charged and presumed innocent until proven guilty.)

  • July 2026 preliminary-hearing coverage on X was split: some accounts called the state’s DNA/video package “ironclad”; others (and defense reporting) stressed ATF inconclusive ballistics, DNA-method challenges, and “little mysteries” on scene gaps.
  • Long-running citizen threads still highlight acoustic two-event claims, backpack/rifle concealment doubts, stairs-guy clothing mismatch, Miranda vs Discord timing, and GSR/physical-test gaps — see sibling pages under Proof Not Tyler.
  • Page focus: Trajectory & Wound Mismatch. Competing official and citizen narratives both deserve documentation; neither substitutes for a completed trial record.

This website's author is @HolonCitizen on X and YouTube/@HolonCitizen. Follow me there.

Interesting​