Multiple Roofs and Other Figures
:::caution Unproven multi-position claims Figures on other roofs — if real — can be workers, students, security, or coincidences. This page documents citizen claims of multi-roof activity around the UVU courtyard. It does not establish a multi-shooter team. :::
The official public story centers on one roof: the Losee Center. Citizen investigators argue that fixation is the problem — that other buildings around the amphitheater also show dark figures, head pops, or crawling silhouettes the same morning, and that the investigation never publicly cleared them with equal rigor.
The Multi-Roof Claim
@ProjectConstitu (July 9, 2026), amplifying @Black_Scout analysis, is a clear statement of the thesis:
Person in all black seen moving on the Woodbury Building roof ~20 minutes before the assassination… video proof of people on the roofs of the Losee Center, Sorensen Center, and Sparks Center that same day… "They had you staring at the wrong roof while unknown figures were moving across several others."
Earlier October 2025 threads already floated a Woodbury rooftop figure ~17 minutes before the shot as a potential breakthrough for second-shooter or patsy theories.
Witness-facing posts also claimed two people in all black at the bottom of stairs to a roof while another was on top (@TwoSides444) — support/security reading vs team reading, both unproven.
Why Multiple Roofs Change the Geometry
If only Losee is manned, the case is a single perch ~430 feet from the stage (public figure range). If Woodbury or another edge is occupied at T-minus 20 minutes:
- Trajectory arguments may need re-mapping (Wound trajectory).
- Acoustic direction claims gain alternative sources (Acoustic split).
- Security failure expands from "one unguarded roof" to "ring of roofs" (UVU campus police, Security team).
- The black-clad early lead may attach to a different building than the jeans/stairwell package.
Relationship to Losee-Only Analysis
This section's other pages mostly assume the figure of interest is on Losee — run, crawl, screwdriver, lip geometry. Multi-roof claims do not erase Losee activity. They ask whether Losee was the only loaded position or the decoy / primary / secondary role in a larger layout.
See also:
- Roof Figure Identity Claims
- Decoy / No Shot From Roof Claims
- Pre-Shot Signal Claims — who a Losee signal would be for
Counterpoints Worth Stating
- Campuses have people on roofs — HVAC, IT, photographers, students. A silhouette is not a rifleman.
- Resolution at distance turns backpacks and vents into "prone shooters."
- Official case may have cleared other roofs in unreleased reports; absence of a public briefing is not proof of a cover-up, though it is a transparency failure.
- Crime-scene trespass cases (e.g. people later entering taped areas) are not the same as pre-shot roof occupation.
Open Questions
- What continuous multi-camera coverage exists for Woodbury, Sorensen, and Sparks roofs for 11:00 a.m.–1:00 p.m. on Sept 10?
- Did bomb dogs, snipers, or UVU police log roof checks for each building that morning?
- Can any figure on a non-Losee roof be identified (worker badge, student, contractor)?
- Do maps used in court include alternate roof LOSs to the tent position?
See also in this section
X.com posts:
This website's author is @HolonCitizen on X and YouTube/@HolonCitizen. Follow me there.
Interesting
- Helicopter video reportedly shows no tape and no screwdriver where testimony placed them.
- That black SUV, a primary forensic object, was later destroyed per vehicle movement records.
- Investigators argue the roof-drop escape window is physically too short to run.