Skip to main content
← Home

Security Team

Charlie Kirk's UVU detail on September 10, 2025 was a hybrid arrangement: TPUSA-funded private close protection plus a limited UVU campus-police contingent. For government police and agencies, see Law Enforcement. Charlie Kirk was assassinated at that event, and because the leading citizen finding is that he was killed by an explosive device carried at the podium, the detail's handling of equipment and staging areas matters as much as its handling of sightlines.

The contracted firm that day was reportedly Rockhouse Integrity Group LLC (DBA Integrity Security Solutions), founded by Brian Harpole — not the prior Shaffer Security Group vendor that had guarded earlier tour stops. According to a September 2025 AP report and Greg Shaffer's public interview, the firm was rehired at the last minute for "specialized security," and the setup was described as lighter than Kirk's prior events, with no bodycams on the detail. High-engagement X coverage (including @HeadlineUSA, September 28, 2025) amplified Shaffer's "stabbed in the back" account of how Integrity came to guard Kirk — a business-dispute narrative, not a court finding of criminal setup. Dan Flood is described in posts as Kirk's head of security; he was in the SUV with Harpole immediately after the shot alongside Rick Cutler, Justin Davis, and Frank Turek. Citizen investigators treat the SUV roster as a must-call witness list for positioning, screening, and immediate medical response — not as proof of collective guilt.

The most visible physical gap was perimeter overwatch: six UVU officers (~25% of the department) under Chief Jeff Long handled crowd control but reportedly did not thoroughly inspect nearby rooftops or engage drones, while posts describe rooftops and airspace as "beyond Charlie's bubble." Harpole gave interviews (Shawn Ryan Show, Salt Lake Tribune) criticizing UVU police over what he described as a failure to secure rooftops as promised, and said he had texted Long pre-event; that characterization is Harpole's and has not been adjudicated; @IngrahamAngle (November 20, 2025) restated Harpole's line that security was "told it would be handled." Mainstream outlets have reported coordination lapses; some citizen threads extend that into intentional-enablement theories, which this section does not adopt as fact. The shooter allegedly reached a prone position on the Losee Center roof overlooking the courtyard — the failure documented on Perimeter & Rooftop Failures and No Counter-Snipers. Parallel suspect-location debates (grey van, acoustic placement) live under Suspects and do not erase the rooftop-control question under the official narrative.

Parallel questions concern preparedness and screening: anonymous posts claim Flood's team had no plan for Therese Bible College on September 11, and that Hunter Kozak — who asked the last Q&A question — should not have been credentialed if prior revocations for "UN-Eff America" affiliates were enforced. Candace Owens reporting alleges Charlie messaged Flood via Signal the night before that he feared being "executed tomorrow." (KM-10) X commentary continues to demand subpoenas for private-security phones, recording glasses, and contracts — advocacy that only court process can test. None of this establishes intent by any security person; gaps in protection are documented here with attribution. Start with Perimeter & Rooftop Failures → Integrity Security Solutions → Dan Flood, then Screening & Credential Gaps if front-of-house access is your focus.

:::caution Legal Disclaimer Nothing in this section constitutes a finding of wrongdoing, negligence, or intentional misconduct by any security personnel, event staff, TPUSA staff, UVU staff, or law enforcement officer. :::

This website's author is @HolonCitizen on X and YouTube/@HolonCitizen. Follow me there.

Interesting​

Images​

This image is a digital screenshot of a text document or notes application featuring white sans-serif text set against a solid black background.
This image is a digital screenshot of a text document or notes application featuring white sans-serif text set against a solid black background. Full write-up →
A square-framed studio headshot of a smiling, middle-aged man with dark, wavy hair flecked with gray.
A square-framed studio headshot of a smiling, middle-aged man with dark, wavy hair flecked with gray. Full write-up →
This is a digital screenshot of a social media post on X (formerly Twitter) by the user ShafferSecurityGroup (@ShafferGroup).
This is a digital screenshot of a social media post on X (formerly Twitter) by the user ShafferSecurityGroup (@ShafferGroup). Full write-up →
This is a digital screenshot of a post on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter) by user Stew Peters (@realstewpeters).
This is a digital screenshot of a post on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter) by user Stew Peters (@realstewpeters). Full write-up →
This is a digital image featuring a screenshot of white text set against a solid black background.
This is a digital image featuring a screenshot of white text set against a solid black background. Full write-up →
This is a digital screenshot of a social media post on X (formerly Twitter) by a user named Jeff Fenske (@JeffFenske).
This is a digital screenshot of a social media post on X (formerly Twitter) by a user named Jeff Fenske (@JeffFenske). Full write-up →
This image is a screenshot of a social media post on X (formerly Twitter) by user Shawn Ryan (@ShawnRyan762).
This image is a screenshot of a social media post on X (formerly Twitter) by user Shawn Ryan (@ShawnRyan762). Full write-up →
This is a digital screenshot of a social media post on X (formerly Twitter) discussing a security detail linked to political figure Charlie Kirk.
This is a digital screenshot of a social media post on X (formerly Twitter) discussing a security detail linked to political figure Charlie Kirk. Full write-up →
This is a composite image or digital meme layout comparing security personnel from two different events, one in 2017 and one in 2025.
This is a composite image or digital meme layout comparing security personnel from two different events, one in 2017 and one in 2025. Full write-up →
This is a medium shot of two men in tactical gear or law enforcement uniforms standing outdoors at what appears to be a firing range or quarry.
This is a medium shot of two men in tactical gear or law enforcement uniforms standing outdoors at what appears to be a firing range or quarry. Full write-up →
This is a digital screen capture of a Facebook post from the "Shaffer Security Group" page, dated April 8, 2017.
This is a digital screen capture of a Facebook post from the "Shaffer Security Group" page, dated April 8, 2017. Full write-up →
This is a side-by-side split-screen comparison image featuring two large, muscular men wearing dark clothing and sunglasses outdoors.
This is a side-by-side split-screen comparison image featuring two large, muscular men wearing dark clothing and sunglasses outdoors. Full write-up →

Videos​

Footage related to this page. Each card opens that clip's own page, with the video, the full write-up, and its source.

The Yrefy Slide Deck: A Sponsor, a Flowchart and Some Arrows
The Yrefy Slide Deck: A Sponsor, a Flowchart and Some ArrowsThis video is an informational presentation slide deck detailing a timeline of events involving the organization YREFY, its representative Laine Schoneberger, and…
0:08