Skip to main content
← Suspicious by Law Enforcement

The Courtyard Paved Over Days After the Shooting (Claims)

:::caution Attributed claims only Restoring a campus after a scene is released is a normal and expected act by a university, and no one described here has been charged with or found to have committed any wrongdoing. Governor Spencer Cox, Dan Merrell, and the other named individuals are living people; the material below consists of reported first-person and secondhand accounts, presented as claims and questions rather than findings. :::

Claim snapshot​

FieldValue
The claimThe ground where Kirk was shot was excavated and paved four days later, reportedly on a rushed state and federal deadline
Raised byDan Merrell (on video, under his own name); @ShadowofEzra; Candace Owens
First surfacedMerrell video shared May 21, 2026; install reportedly Sept 14, 2025
Rests onNamed witness account on video, quoting an unnamed third party
Evidence ratingMODERATE

What is alleged​

Contractor Daniel "Dan" Merrell of Hardscape Utah says on video that he was called in to install pavers over the UVU courtyard and showed up to help. In his own account, he describes two coordinators on site — one he says was in charge of a state-owned facility in American Fork, the other a maintenance groundskeeper at a Provo facility — and quotes the second man as telling him: "This is above our pay grade. The FBI and the state — the governor and the FBI — that's what they told me. The governor and the FBI said they want this done by Monday. And we need to get it done." Merrell also says the coordinator told the crew they were not talking to anybody or saying anything to the media.

The paver installation is reported as taking place on Sunday, September 14, 2025 — four days after the shooting — with researchers alleging roughly eight to ten inches of soil were excavated. Merrell himself describes the excavation in ordinary trade terms: "to do pavers correctly you over-excavate, you get rid of the top... you want to get a good base."

Separate compiled notes in the investigation file make a set of additional claims about a company recorded as "Hardscape Specialties LLC": that it performed the tent-area paving, that it had been dormant for roughly twenty years before being revived in February 2025, that owner Michael Powell is a Utah Attorney General special agent, that co-owner Burton Romrell is former UVU operations staff, that the work order issued two days after the shooting, and that no public bidding process is mentioned. Those notes remain unverified and are not corroborated by Merrell's account, which names a different firm. The same notes record that UVU said the work was prescheduled, and that reporting which examined a rumor blaming the suspect's father's company found no credible link.

The ordinary explanation​

Once investigators formally released the scene, a university had a strong and entirely ordinary interest in getting that ground covered fast. Ten thousand or more students were about to return to a campus with a blood-stained patch of dirt in the middle of it — that is a public-health matter, a grief-management matter, and a question of whether the school wanted a permanent morbid landmark in its main courtyard. A "by Monday" deadline is precisely what you would expect for a campus reopening at the start of a school week, and weekend work is how you hit a Monday date without students underfoot. Merrell's description of over-excavating to build a proper base is standard paver installation practice, not evidence removal.

The attribution is also the weakest link in the chain. Merrell is relaying, secondhand, what an unnamed on-site coordinator told him about who wanted the work done. That is hearsay about attribution — a groundskeeper's paraphrase of an instruction, several removes from anyone who could actually issue one. It is not proof that any governor or bureau gave the order, and a coordinator saying "above my pay grade" is the most common way a mid-level employee describes an instruction from anywhere above him. On procurement, hardscape work of this size can fall under bid thresholds or emergency-procurement rules, which exist for exactly this kind of situation.

What would settle it​

  1. Obtain the UVU work order and purchase records for the courtyard job — the issuing date, the authorizing signature, and the procurement route used.
  2. Obtain the scene-release documentation showing when investigators relinquished the courtyard and whether soil was collected as evidence first.
  3. Identify and interview the two on-site coordinators Merrell describes, who are the only people who can say who actually told them "Monday."
  4. Obtain UVU's records supporting its statement that the work was prescheduled — a prior contract or calendar entry would resolve the timing dispute outright.

Sources​