← Suspicious Hospital, Autopsy and Medical

The Wound Trajectory Entrance-Exit Dispute (Claims)

:::caution Attributed claims only — and these claims contradict each other Tyler Robinson is charged, not convicted, and is presumed innocent. No board-certified forensic pathologist is on record in the investigation file endorsing any of the readings below. They are online interpretations of compressed video, and they are mutually incompatible: some argue there was no exit, some that the neck wound is the exit, some that there was no bullet at all. :::

What is not in dispute is that Charlie Kirk was killed at Utah Valley University on September 10, 2025; citizen investigators on X have converged by large majority on the view that an explosive device, not the government's rifle round, produced the wound being argued about below.

A circulated infographic of the claimed ballistic trajectory through the neck and head. Full write-up →

Claim snapshot

Field	Value
The claim	The official wound account is wrong — the entrance and exit are reversed, or there was no bullet
Raised by	Jon Bray (@jonaaronbray); @RedRandumbYRuminations via an uncredited relay; Rob O'Neill; unnamed "medical experts"
First surfaced	Undated in source
Rests on	Anonymous and attributed video analysis by non-pathologists — no autopsy report, no pathologist
Evidence rating	SPECULATIVE — the competing theories cite the same footage and refute one another

What is alleged

The charging affidavit reports that Kirk "appeared to have been hit in the neck," with "blood coming out of the left side of his neck as he fell over to his left." The surgeon who treated him reportedly described the wound as an "absolute miracle" because the bullet did not exit, potentially saving bystanders. No surgeon's name was released.

From there the accounts diverge, sharply.

Jon Bray calls the non-exit account "ballistically absurd," arguing a bullet cannot come to rest under the skin because of what he describes as "dense bones."

@RedRandumbYRuminations, relayed by an uncredited account, argues the opposite — that a right-to-left force vector with entry near the right temple caused hydrostatic pressure to bulge the left neck and jaw, meaning the visible left-neck defect is an exit wound. The stakes are stated openly: "if the front neck wound is an EXIT, it clears Tyler." Former Navy SEAL Rob O'Neill offers the same reading in one line: "you can clearly see an exit wound on Charlie's left hand side." A separate USMC-sniper analysis in the file contends the shot came from slightly behind Kirk's right side and that "we saw the exit wound."

A further argument, attributed only to unnamed "medical experts," holds that Kirk's decorticate posturing "can only be due to a MIDBRAIN injury," and therefore that a weapon activated from high and behind is "the only explanation which makes any sense."

The ordinary explanation

Start with the structural problem: these theories cancel each other out. No exit at all, the neck is the exit, and no bullet at all cannot simultaneously be true — yet each is argued from the same footage, which is itself evidence that the footage does not determine the answer.

The "absolute miracle" non-exit claim is ordinary ballistics, not an absurdity. Rifle bullets routinely fail to exit after yawing, fragmenting, or striking bone; a projectile coming to rest under the skin on the far side is a textbook finding that any forensic pathologist has seen many times. The investigation file undercuts Bray on its own terms: it elsewhere records a T1 fragment recovered from the neck and an ATF analysis performed on a bullet recovered during the autopsy — both of which presuppose the round stayed in the body. If nothing had stayed in the body, there would have been nothing for the ATF to examine.

Second, entrance-versus-exit is a determination made by a pathologist at the tissue level — reading beveling, abrasion collars, and soot deposition on the actual body. It cannot be made from compressed internet video by people who are not pathologists, however confident or credentialed in other fields they may be. Rob O'Neill is a decorated combat veteran; that is not a qualification in forensic pathology, and neither is deer hunting.

Third, "decorticate posturing can only indicate midbrain injury" overstates the specificity of a clinical sign, and it is attributed to no named expert at all. Posturing after catastrophic neurological insult does not isolate a single anatomical culprit, and a clinical sign observed in a video clip is not a diagnosis.

What would settle it

1. Unseal and release the autopsy report — beveling, abrasion collar, and soot findings resolve entrance versus exit definitively.
2. Release the full ATF report on the bullet jacket fragment recovered during the autopsy, including where in the body it was recovered.
3. Obtain the treating surgeon's operative note and the identity of the physician who described the wound as an "absolute miracle."
4. Have a board-certified forensic pathologist review the record and state, on the record, what the wound track was.

Interesting In This Area

• Entrance or exit is argued at length in the cause-of-death section.
• No blood spray and no exit wound is the energy argument against a rifle.
• Chest wound accounts conflict with the neck wound the affidavit describes.
• No autopsy means no pathologist has resolved any of it.

Interesting In Other Areas

• Shape charge versus bullet scores the examiner findings against two mechanisms.
• Wound trajectory and angle works the same dispute from the ballistics side.
• Trajectory and wound mismatch is why some argue the roof position fails.
• One witness described a chest hit, then revised it to the neck.

Images

This image is a video frame showing the exterior entrance of a brutalist-style concrete building with large, dark-framed reflective glass windows. Full write-up →

This image is a screenshot from a video broadcast featuring a picture-in-picture layout. Full write-up →

This is a slightly blurry, candid exterior shot of a crowd of people gathered outside the glass entrance of a modern building during the daytime. Full write-up →

Other Pages In This Section

Suspicious Posts Before the Event

Social media posted before the shooting that reads, in hindsight, like anticipation — and the open question of whether anyone who wrote it was ever interviewed. Hindsight makes ordinary posts look prophetic, which is exactly why these are handled carefully.

Read this

The Senior Executive Who Collected the SD Cards (Claims)

A senior TPUSA executive who reportedly never works campus stops was at UVU on September 10 and took the camera SD cards. UVU was reportedly the opening night of a new national tour — exactly where a national events executive would be.

Read this

The COO's Alleged Call to 'Pierre Du Pont' (Claims)

Candace Owens alleges TPUSA's new COO took a call right after the shooting with a man she believes is "Pierre Du Pont," with a billion-dollar partnership at stake. No call record, no confirmed identity, and the billion dollars has never been documented in any form.

Read this

The Jailhouse Informant Transported Before a Closed Hearing (Claims)

An inmate held in the same jail was moved around the preliminary hearing, and posters infer he is being positioned as a jailhouse informant. They concede it is the "only logical explanation" they could reach — not something any filing shows.

Read this

Elsewhere In The Investigation

Shape Charge vs Bullet: from Medical Examiner results

The medical examiner findings quoted in the court filing — hemopericardium, bilateral hemothorax, subarachnoid hemorrhage — scored against two hypotheses side by side. The clearest place to see which mechanism the injuries actually fit.

Read this

Wound Trajectory & Angle

A 5 to 9 degree downward shot from the Losee roof should meet face or jaw first. The reported entry sits between larynx and trachea, left of the spine — a far more straight-on path. The geometry is the argument.

Read this

Trajectory & Wound Mismatch

The argument that a rooftop .30-06 cannot match the reported neck wound path, the energy, or the blood evidence. It is the single thread connecting almost every cause-of-death dispute on this site.

Read this

Shot in the Chest, Then the Neck — One Witness, Two Accounts

One witness, two accounts: chest first, then neck. The page tracks when the account changed, and what else changed around it.

Read this

Sources

• Charging affidavit language ("hit in the neck," "blood… from the left side"): investigation file, court filing excerpt.
• Jon Bray (@jonaaronbray), "ballistically absurd" / exploding-mic analysis: investigation file. No direct URL is recorded for this claim.
• @RedRandumbYRuminations right-to-left vector argument, relayed by an uncredited account: investigation file. No direct URL is recorded.
• Rob O'Neill, "exit wound on Charlie's left hand side": investigation file transcript excerpt.
• "Decorticate posturing" claim: investigation file, "Medical Experts" section. Attributed to unnamed experts; no source is cited.
• Related: entrance or exit — cause of death analysis

This website's author is @HolonCitizen on X and YouTube/@HolonCitizen. Follow me there.

Interesting

• Two official records give arrest times six hours apart for the same booking.
• An Egyptian-registered jet reportedly sat at Provo from Sept 4 and flew home Sept 11.
• A contractor says ten inches of soil were already gone from the homicide scene by Sept 14.

Related Areas

• Wound trajectory and shot angle
• The .30-06 energy mismatch argument
• What actually caused the death

• The case that Tyler was not the shooter
• Tyler Robinson — charged, not convicted
• Ballistics and the recovered fragment