The Sept 9 Posts, and Whether Their Author Was Ever Interviewed (Claims)
This page names nobody. The account in the screenshot below belongs to a private individual who has not been charged with anything, has not been accused of anything by any authority, and is not alleged by this site to have had any knowledge of or connection to what happened on September 10, 2025. The display name, handle and avatar have been blacked out by this site even though the screenshot circulated publicly with them visible. Read the rest of this page with that at the front of your mind.
Account identity redacted by this site. Screenshot posted by @YinYang18175500 on X, July 30, 2026. IPFS CID QmeKWYcNmcbzZoBcEqWbjysBrg6VxkrW9soWFud8RoPiha.
What Was Posted
On July 30, 2026, an X user posting as @YinYang18175500 replied into the thread where attorney @aburkhartlaw had published the State's bindover memorandum. The reply read, in full:
"@aburkhartlaw I was going through some screenshots from September 10th, do you know if this dude was interrogated? Probably a friend of TR's?"
Attached was a phone screenshot, itself saved on September 10, 2025 at 9:53 PM, showing two posts from a single account dated September 9, 2025 — the day before the shooting. The visible text reads:
"Charlie kirk is coming to my college tomorrow i rlly hope someone evaporates him literally" — 12:37 PM, Sep 9, 2025, 62 views
"Lets just say something big will happen tomorrow" — Sep 9, with an attached reaction image
The second post carried 2 replies, 34 likes and 1.1K views at the time of the screenshot.
The Question That Was Actually Asked
Strip out the speculation and one procedural question remains: did anyone from law enforcement speak to this person?
That question is legitimate and unanswered in public. A campus-linked account posting "I rlly hope someone evaporates him" about a speaker, roughly twenty-four hours before that speaker was shot on that campus, is the sort of thing an ordinary investigation would look at, log, and close. There is no public record of whether that happened. Neither the charging documents, the preliminary hearing witnesses, nor the State's bindover memorandum make any reference to it.
An investigation that checked and cleared this person looks nothing like one that never checked. Only the second is a problem, and the public cannot currently tell which occurred.
What The Post Also Did, And Which This Site Does Not Adopt
The same reply added: "Probably a friend of TR's?"
There is no evidence offered for that, none has surfaced since, and this site does not adopt it. It is a guess appended to a screenshot. Connecting a stranger's social media posts to Tyler Robinson requires evidence of an actual connection, and none has been presented by anyone. We record that the claim was made because that is what the source said; we record it as a guess because that is what it is.
The Ordinary Explanation, Stated Fully
The overwhelmingly likely reading is the boring one.
"I hope someone evaporates him" is the register of online political speech in 2025 — hyperbolic, performative, and produced in enormous volume by people who go on to do nothing at all. Charlie Kirk was among the most-discussed political figures in the country and a campus visit generated a great deal of hostile chatter, essentially all of it from people with no involvement in anything. The post had 62 views.
"Lets just say something big will happen tomorrow" reads as ominous only in hindsight. A high-profile speaker arriving on a small campus is something big happening tomorrow, and it was publicly announced. Attached to a joke reaction image, the post reads far more naturally as a student being dramatic about a campus event than as anything else. Hindsight is what supplies the menace, and hindsight is exactly the bias this section exists to guard against.
There is also a question about the screenshot itself. It was captured on the evening of September 10 and circulated ten and a half months later. Nothing has been offered to authenticate it, the account has not been shown to still exist, and the site has not independently verified that the posts are genuine or unaltered.
What Would Settle It
A single sentence from the FBI or Utah County investigators confirming whether pre-event social media by campus-linked accounts was reviewed, and whether any authors were interviewed, resolves the entire question without identifying anyone. That is a records question, and it is the kind of thing the proposed disclosure laws are designed to force.
Until then this stays exactly where it is: an open procedural question about investigative completeness, attached to no person and supporting no allegation.
X.com posts:
This website's author is @HolonCitizen on X and YouTube/@HolonCitizen. Follow me there.
Interesting
- A whistleblower says he walked into a closed high-clearance task force meeting the day before.
- DOJ released only about 12,285 documents by the December deadline, and was accused of flouting the law.
- One draft law demands records of any files destroyed by a covered organization.