Moore DM Group / "Resource One" (Claims)
:::caution Attributed claims only Vendors doing direct-mail work is lawful. The figures below are one investigator's reading of public filings, disputed by TPUSA. Nothing here is a finding of a crime. :::
Entity snapshot
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Entity | Moore DM Group (political direct-mail conglomerate) |
| DBA in TPUSA filings (per claim) | "Resource One" |
| Scale (per notes) | Described as a ~$700M direct-mail company |
| Alleged TPUSA payments | $9M+ to "Resource One," vs $1.35M TPUSA reportedly lists for printing |
| Linked entity | 1Ten LLC; Arizona figure Jake Hoffman |
| Evidence rating | EMERGING / disputed |
Connection to the Charlie Kirk case
According to @theleahfiles, TPUSA's "Resource One" printing vendor is not a small printer but a DBA for Moore DM Group, a large political direct-mail company. She reports TPUSA paid $9M+ to "Resource One" while its 990 lists only about $1.35M for printing, and links the chain to 1Ten LLC and Arizona Republican figure Jake Hoffman. Her question is where the difference went and whether the vendor labeling obscures political direct-mail spending.
This is an attributed allegation, not a proven finding. TPUSA's attorney Robert Barnes rejects all such claims, saying the organization "clearly complied with tax law."
Why investigators track it
The direct-mail chain is the single largest dollar figure in the citizen-investigator compilations, which is why it recurs in the DOGE audit discussion. Reconciling "Resource One," Moore DM Group, and 1Ten is a core audit task.
Open questions
- Does TPUSA's ledger confirm "Resource One" = Moore DM Group?
- What explains any gap between amounts paid and amounts categorized as printing?
- What is 1Ten LLC's documented role in the chain?
Sources
- @theleahfiles direct-mail thread; Wolves And Finance video
- Robert Barnes rebuttal (via Paramount Tactical)