Three Trends Charts: Robinson's Name, the Losee Center, the Mauser 98
What This Video Is
One minute fifteen seconds, posted to X by the account rendered in stylised block capitals as WULF. It is a two-presenter format: a short reaction bookend from a man in a grey cap, and a body segment delivered by a second presenter in a green t-shirt and a "Musgrove" bucket hat standing in front of a green screen with graphics keyed in behind him.
It is a produced piece rather than a raw capture. The presenter has assembled his exhibits in advance — mugshots, satellite imagery, chart screenshots, a screenshot of somebody else's post on X — and walks through them in a fixed order. That makes it a good example of the search-trend genre at its most polished, and a good place to look at what the genre does and does not deliver.
What Is Said
The presenter's script is tightly organised around three charts, each introduced the same way and each left as a question rather than an assertion. He frames the whole thing at the top as "a set of coincidences for you to ponder," and repeats near the end, sarcastically, "these are all just coincidences."
Chart one, the name. "According to Google Trends, somebody — maybe multiple — in the DC metro area was searching for Tyler James Robinson one day before the assassination of Charlie Kirk." He then does something that is genuinely to his credit: he points out the enormous spike on September 12 and explains it himself. "That's when we all found out, through the news, who he was and started Googling his name." His claim rests on a much smaller bump he places on September 9, which he characterises as "kind of weird, don't you think?"
Chart two, the building. "What about the Losee Center, the building where Tyler Robinson allegedly shot Charlie Kirk from? Well, again, for some reason, a small number of people in the Washington, D.C. area was Googling Losee Center two days prior… September 8, 2025."
Chart three, the rifle. "What about a Mauser 98? Well, evidently there was pretty much no interest in the Mauser 98 until August 27th, when somebody, once again, in DC was like — hmm, I am curious about the Mauser 98."
The closing claim. He then asserts that the data has since disappeared: "since this information has gone viral, people are now reporting that all of that data has now been scrubbed. And so this is what it looks like now. Nothing to see here." He signs off with an expletive of disbelief.
The presenter uses hedged language consistently — "somebody, maybe multiple", "allegedly", "for some reason", "people are now reporting" — and he never names anyone. That is unusual in this material and worth recording.
What The Footage Shows
The exhibits appear in sequence behind the presenter: mugshot images captioned "Tyler James Robinson"; a Google Trends chart for tyler james robinson filtered to the Washington DC area, with the large September 12 spike and a much smaller September 9 bump; a Google Earth satellite view with the Losee Center marked as the claimed vantage point; a Trends chart for losee center with a bump at September 8; a side-by-side of Robinson and a Mauser 98 rifle; a Trends chart for mauser 98 with a rise at August 27; a screenshot of a post on X claiming the data was scrubbed; and finally a Google Trends page displaying an error message reporting insufficient data for the query.
Three cautions belong on the page, because the charts on screen do not carry the weight the framing puts on them.
The Trends index is relative, not a count. When the presenter's own chart contains a September 12 spike normalised to 100 — the day the name went worldwide — every earlier point on that chart is being measured against a national news event. A "small bump" beside that peak can represent an extremely small number of queries, and at low volumes Google's sampling and rounding make single-day bumps unstable. Re-running the same query on a different day can produce a different small bump.
The last exhibit is not what it is presented as. A Trends page showing "insufficient data" is the normal output for a low-volume query in a narrow region, and it is also what you get when the region, the date range or the category filter differs even slightly from the earlier run. It is consistent with data being removed. It is equally consistent with a different query. The video does not show the two queries side by side with identical filters, which is what would distinguish them. The site treats this whole question separately on Trends deletion and suppression claims.
And nothing in any of these charts identifies a searcher. A metro-area label reflects the network the request came from, not a person, and Tyler Robinson is a common name.
How It Connects
- Tyler Robinson and Lance Twiggs searches — the site's page on the name-search claim.
- UVU Campus and Location Searches — where the Losee Center query claim is assessed.
- Mauser 30-06 rifle — the weapon in the third chart, and what is actually known about it.
- Trends deletion and suppression claims — the disappearing-data claim the video ends on.
- DC Metro search patterns — the wider set of claims about this geography.
- Google Searches — the hub, and its standing caution that Trends cannot show who searched or why.