\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Still More Disturbing Searches\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\": The Two-Hour YouTube Stream
What This Video Is
Two hours three minutes, downloaded from YouTube as a .webm rather than captured from X. The title on the platform is "Yes, Still MORE DISTURBING Searches from before Charlie Kirk Passed". It is the longest-running item in this section and the third instalment of a series — the presenter refers back to "the last couple of weeks" of streams on the same subject and is the same voice as the twenty-minute Israeli-IP walkthrough elsewhere in this section.
No visual description has been produced for this file, so what follows is drawn from the audio, in which the presenter narrates his own screen shares continuously.
It is a live stream with all that implies. He apologises at the top for a rushed setup after "kid duty", reads viewer comments aloud partway through, and closes with a long personal anecdote about a car dealership that has nothing to do with the case. A viewer should expect perhaps ninety minutes of substance inside two hours of broadcast.
What Is Said
The method statement, first ten minutes. This is the most valuable part of the stream and it is unusually careful. He explains what Google Trends is — that it "purports to reflect what searches were conducted and where and when those searches were conducted" — and then states his own limits: "I take that at face value. I don't have access to the underlying data." He repeats his standing rule: "I draw no conclusions from what I find. I draw no conclusions from what I choose to present here." He also concedes he is showing a selection: "I cannot present everything I found. It's too numerous, too voluminous."
The disappearance test. He claims that terms he covers on air tend to stop returning results afterwards, and — to his credit — describes running a control rather than just asserting it. He says he has tested search terms from unrelated breaking news stories involving violence, and that those "don't tend to disappear, at least not nearly at the pace that the terms associated with Charlie Kirk's story tend to disappear after I cover them." He goes further and distinguishes three groups: queries he runs privately and never mentions; queries he discusses privately with others by text; and queries he covers on the channel. He says the first group persists and the last does not, and leaves the inference to the audience: "I'll leave it for you to decide what that means."
That is a testable design, and it is more rigorous than anything else in this corpus. It is also unverified — nobody has independently reproduced it, and low-volume Trends queries are known to return inconsistently between runs for ordinary technical reasons.
The Trends walk. He re-covers ground from his earlier streams for new viewers: the hospital in Orem, the Utah medical examiner Deirdre Amaro with a claimed Israel-geolocated search on June 30, 2025 and no comparable DC or Utah interest, and the Utah Department of Public Safety commissioner appointed on July 17. As before he argues against his own exhibit on the last one, offering the ordinary explanation that a new appointment gets looked up.
The photographer sequence. The middle of the stream turns from charts to frames, and this is where it becomes speculative. He studies a man near the stage — he calls him "Armboy" — with a telephoto lens and what he believes is an earpiece, and narrates a sequence: the man looks behind the stage through the long lens, lowers the camera, leans in as if toward someone under the tent, then looks out into the distance rather than at Kirk. His claimed tell is a lanyard that "goes from white to black" without the man looking down at it. He states the man worked for a firm he names as Schaefer Security Group, and reports an Israel-geolocated search for that firm's name on August 2 — while immediately offering the ordinary reading himself: "maybe someone just took an interest in hiring Schaefer security overseas for something at that time, or maybe they were using a VPN."
The reconstruction. From there he sketches a two-source scenario: a diversionary report from distance drawing attention while a closer, higher shot does the damage, with the necklace and the shirt movement explained by something energetic at the body rather than by the distant round. He speculates about calibre, noting that a .300 Blackout and a .30-06 share a bullet diameter.
What he says about the people he names. He is explicit and repeated about not accusing anyone. Of Frank Turek he says plainly: "I don't know that Turek was involved at all. I'm not blaming Turek." Near the end he restates it for the whole stream: "I truly am making no claims in this video. I have my thoughts, but I'm making no claims." He also says he believes Tyler Robinson is a patsy — a belief, offered as such.
This site adopts none of it. Every person he names or gestures at is a living individual who has been charged with nothing, and Tyler Robinson is charged and not convicted. A lanyard changing apparent colour in compressed video, a man looking in a direction, and a low-volume search chart are not evidence that anyone did anything.
What The Footage Shows
The visual track is screen share plus talking head. He runs Google Trends live, changing region filters between Israel, the District of Columbia and Utah so the chart redraws on camera, and later switches to event footage which he scrubs frame by frame, zooming repeatedly — "we zoom in, we zoom in, we zoom in" — on a figure a few dozen pixels tall.
The gap between argument and image is at its widest in the photographer sequence. What is visible is a man with a camera, a lanyard, and possibly an earpiece, doing things that photographers and event staff do: looking around, lowering a camera, leaning toward a colleague. The colour change he treats as the key tell is exactly the artefact that heavy digital zoom on compressed video produces when a thin bright object crosses a dark background at a different frame or exposure.
How It Connects
- Google Searches — the hub, and the standing caution that Trends cannot show who searched or why.
- Trends deletion and suppression claims — the disappearance claim this stream tries to test.
- Timpanogos, Examiner and Surgeon Searches — the medical-route charts he re-covers.
- Cover-up indicators — where the disappearance and record-availability claims are collected.
- The necklace and the residue — the physical claim his reconstruction depends on.
- Frank Turek — the person he names and expressly declines to accuse.
- Security team and protective detail — the staffing question behind the photographer sequence.