The Two-Hour Ben-Nun / Project Constitution / Ty Norman Livestream
What This Video Is
Two hours nineteen minutes. This is the single longest item in the video corpus and it is not a clip — it is a full three-way livestream, recorded from a Zoom-style call and later reposted to X by the account Project Constitution under the headline "BREAKING: UNDENIABLE PROOF OF MULTIPLE SHOOTERS IN CHARLIE KIRK ASS…" (marked "#2", a companion to the shorter item in this section).
The host introduces himself in the first sentence: "Good afternoon, friends, Steven Ben-Nun with Israeli News Live." His two guests are Colin Campbell, who runs the Project Constitution channel, and Ty Norman, whose channel is "We Are Not Going To Mars" and who mentions early on that he was banned from TikTok. The three are collaborators rather than an interviewer and subjects; Norman says plainly that "everything I've done in my work has really been based off of everything that they've done in their work."
No visual description has been produced for this file, so the account below of what is on screen is reconstructed from the audio, in which the participants narrate their own screen shares.
Because of its length, this page summarises the segments rather than transcribing them. Everything below is what the three men assert. None of it is adopted here.
What Is Said
The correction, opening minutes. Norman begins by walking back part of the previous day's broadcast. He had identified a projectile passing the head of a running figure; on review he says "it was moving a little bit too slow to be a bullet." He keeps the wider claim: "I stand by all of my work, the two shots."
The two-shot thesis. This is the spine of the whole stream and the three return to it repeatedly. Ben-Nun sets it up: "Ty has really pulled together the fact that Charlie Kirk was not shot once, he was shot twice. There's even eyewitnesses that can back up that information." Norman's version late in the stream is blunter: "Charlie Kirk was shot twice. That is undeniable."
The claimed shooter geometry. Norman describes what he calls "three patsies, two shooters, two distractions." He states that the figure at the barrier is "the palm shooter" and that a second position, which he has "coined the BA sniper", lay behind and to Kirk's right. He is explicit about the gap in his own evidence: "we don't have any video footage of the actual second that the shot was taken from that area," and he appeals on air for anyone holding footage of that angle to send it. He notes that Candace Owens has publicly asked for the same angle.
Muzzle flash, window reflection and infrared beam. Campbell's contribution is a claimed muzzle-flash reflection in a window near a stairwell, plus a claimed infrared beam. Norman treats these as the anchors of his triangulation: "you cannot fake the infrared beam. You can't fake the flash in the window. You can't fake the bullet coming at the same exact trajectory that the infrared beam was on." They work through Google Maps and hand-drawn graphics on screen trying to fix a position, and Ben-Nun suggests doing "the actual math on it" as a later exercise — an admission that the triangulation shown is eyeballed rather than calculated.
The microphone. As in the shorter companion clip, the exploding-microphone thesis is rejected on air: "the microphone did not blow up. It's still there. These are little magnets that slide off real easy… I know that it did not cause a discharge that went through Charlie's body."
The shirt sequence. Norman presents a frame-by-frame graphic of the shirt displacing, which he says shows a first impact from behind and a second arriving from the front-left while the fabric was still raised.
Google Trends and Israeli IP addresses. Around the two-thirds mark the stream turns to search data. The participants relay another researcher's work in which the names of case figures — they list a medical examiner, the tail number of a US Army surveillance aircraft, the incoming FBI Salt Lake City official, a Utah public safety official, and the student who asked the final question — are said to have been queried before the shooting, clustering around late June, from IP addresses geolocating to Israel. To their credit they raise the obvious objection themselves: "could it be a VPN, somebody trying to spoof Israel? Obviously, it could be." They also flag a July 20, 2025 cluster as significant, and discuss a search for George Zinn — the man who stood up immediately after the shooting shouting that he had done it — reportedly originating from the District of Columbia.
Aircraft. Ben-Nun previews, and the stream later covers, aircraft "that were flying over that were almost at stall speed."
Motive for doing it. The closing minutes are a defence of the participants' own conduct. Norman says he has "spent more money on this case than I am going to make," and Ben-Nun notes he is "banned from advertisements." The stream ends with birthday wishes and a discussion of vitamins and grounding, which is a fair marker of how much of the two hours is not evidence.
Two claims deserve explicit distancing. Nothing here establishes that any second person fired anything at UVU, and every person named or gestured at in this stream is a living individual who has been charged with nothing. Tyler Robinson is charged and not convicted. Search-traffic geolocation is not attribution: an IP address that resolves to a country identifies a network route, not a person, and the participants concede the VPN problem on air.
What The Footage Shows
The visual track is a call window with screen shares. The participants appear in tiled video boxes; Ben-Nun repeatedly asks whether a share is visible ("Can you guys see that?"), and at one point Norman holds a physical object up to his webcam and asks "Can you see me doing that?" — which is the level of production involved.
The shared material includes social-media stills, Google Maps satellite views, hand-annotated graphics with a red dot marking a claimed hide position, looped crowd footage, the shirt-displacement sequence, screen recordings of Google Trends charts, and news screenshots including a governor's statement that a person of interest was in custody.
The honest summary is that almost nothing original is shown. The stream is three people reacting live to material other people produced, annotating it in real time on shared screens, and reasoning aloud about it. That is not worthless — it is the clearest single record of how this cluster of claims was assembled and by whom — but it is a record of a discussion, not of an event.
How It Connects
- The Shirt Before the Blood — the shirt-displacement sequence at the centre of the two-shot argument.
- Entrance or Exit — the wound-track question any two-shooter geometry must satisfy.
- Stairs Guy and the Backpack — the running figure the stream's opening correction concerns.
- Israeli Search Patterns (Claims) — the site's treatment of the Israeli-IP search claim, including its limits.
- July 20, 2025 anchor — the date cluster the participants single out.
- George Zinn — the man whose name they discuss as a search term.
- Project Constitution and @RealTruthJustic — accounts that carried this material.
- More reasons Tyler Robinson may not be the assassin — the wider argument this stream is contributing to.