Skip to main content

Jimmy Dore Segment: \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Palm Gun\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\", the Shirt Puff, and Two Shots

What This Video Is

Seven minutes forty-six seconds, circulated on X by the account Project Constitution under the headline "BREAKING: UNDENIABLE PROOF OF MULTIPLE SHOOTERS IN CHARLIE KIRK ASS…". It is a repost, not original material: the content is a segment of an online talk show hosted by Jimmy Dore, who appears on camera in a fedora and glasses, with at least one co-host addressed as "Steve" speaking off-mic.

The segment is built from three ingredients — social-media stills and clips of a man at the barrier at UVU, a frame-by-frame pass over footage of Kirk at the table, and, at the end, an excerpt from an outdoor interview with an older male eyewitness. Dore narrates over all of it live, reacting as he goes rather than presenting a prepared case, which is why the transcript reads as thinking-aloud rather than argument.

Two things distinguish this from the other Brown Shirt items. It comes with a named host on camera rather than anonymous captions. And it argues against one of the investigation's better-known theories, not just for a new one.

What Is Said

Dore opens by framing the dispute he thinks he is resolving: "Everybody's been arguing over — well, no, he was shot in the front. No, he was shot from the side. But he's actually shot from both."

He then introduces the weapon claim, explaining the term for viewers: "This guy here had what they call a palm gun… They're circular, and if it's in your palm, that's why I call it a palm gun." He plays the crowd footage, and at roughly 0:30 says: "So did you see him? He went to pull up his sleeve and that's exactly when you hear the — okay."

His stated tell is the sleeve, and he is careful to say it is an appearance rather than a finding, at least at first: "So it looks like he's pretending to pull up his sleeve and he has a palm gun. That's what it looks like." He then hardens: "his sleeve, already rolled up to his bicep, and he feels the need to roll it up even more, which is suspicious." By about 2:00 the hedging is gone — "This is your assassin right here, guys" — and he becomes visibly frustrated with sceptics: "It's unbelievable that people can watch this and say, no, you're just delusional… That is a palm gun. Look it up."

That is an accusation of murder, made on camera by a named commentator, against a living private individual who has been charged with nothing. It is recorded here because he said it. It is not adopted here, and it has never been tested anywhere.

The more useful part of the segment is the part that cuts against the grain. Dore examines the microphone and rejects the exploding-mic thesis outright, on camera: "Now you guys can see clearly the microphone did not blow up. It's still there. These are little magnets that slide off real easy. Anybody saying that this blew up — it did not blow up." He leaves one door open — "I don't know if it was set to blow up, that could be another theory… Maybe it was a detonated device that just didn't go off" — but he is unambiguous on the operative point: "I know that it did not cause a discharge that went through Charlie's body."

He then offers his own two-shot reconstruction, and this is the section that gives the segment its headline. He argues the shirt "poofed out" from a first impact and that a second round arrived while the fabric was still displaced, "creating a temporary indention in the middle of the shirt and raising it from where it was poofed out." He times the two so tightly that, in his account, "it was all on cue… so that all the shots ended up sounding like one." He also reads the object seen leaving Kirk as an earpiece rather than tissue: "his earpiece is flying out at this point in time… Some people thought it was maybe some splatter coming out of the back of his head."

The segment closes with the eyewitness excerpt. The unnamed older man says he saw a red patch appear at the chest — "right where his heart is, it started going red" — and then describes something he found notable about the crowd: he looked for people close to a shooter being trampled or rushed, and "I saw nothing like that at all."

What The Footage Shows

The show footage is straightforward: a static medium close-up of the host talking, with graphics cut in.

The evidentiary footage is not. It opens at 0:00 on an extreme close-up of grainy crowd video with a red circle drawn around a white speck a few pixels across, captioned "BULLET". From 0:12 the crop tightens onto a man's hand with red circles and text asserting a palm gun is in it, and technical diagrams of a palm-pistol pattern are placed alongside for comparison. From 0:38 to about 1:14 the arm movement loops repeatedly with graphics labelling a "bullet" or a "bow shock".

None of those frames contain a visible weapon. What they contain is a small bright speck and a hand, at a magnification where the codec is generating detail rather than recording it, and a diagram of a real object placed next to them for the viewer to complete the match themselves. Dore's own language concedes this more than once — "that looks like", "it looks like that little scope thing is coming in between these two fingers" — before he settles on certainty.

The shirt analysis is the stronger visual passage, because there the object being examined is large, well-lit and centre-frame: Kirk at the table in a white shirt, the fabric visibly displacing, the microphone still in place afterwards. That the microphone is still there is simply visible, and it is the one thing on this page that the footage genuinely establishes rather than argues.

How It Connects

Other Videos In This Section

← Back to The Brown Shirt Figure · All video evidence