Skip to main content

A Retraction: \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"I Posted a Video Speculating That, But I Was Wrong\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

What This Video Is

One minute twenty seconds, selfie-style: a woman with glasses and dark hair speaking straight to camera, with photographs, screenshots and short video clips dropped into the lower half of the frame to illustrate each point. An on-screen caption at the top reads "Setting the record straight on the bearded man in Charlie Kirk's security detail."

It is worth flagging what kind of item this is, because there is nothing else quite like it in this corpus: it is a retraction. The presenter's purpose is to withdraw a claim she herself published days earlier, on camera, at the top of the clip, before saying anything else.

What Is Said

She opens with the correction and does not bury it: "Hey guys, I'm very sorry. I just wanted to set the record straight on something. A few days ago I posted a video speculating that this guy might be a Hollywood FX specialist, but I was wrong."

She then credits the people who corrected her by handle — she names four accounts, among them @Piper_truth1, @shogtongue and @rdxctd — saying they "have done a serious amount of legwork identifying TPUSA's security team." Their identification, she reports, is that the bearded man is Blake Harruff, a member of the protective detail, "with a tattoo match sealing the deal." She adds a light aside about how many men now wear the same beard, which is a fair account of why the original error was easy to make.

She notes two follow-on observations about him. He appears in a photograph in Montana alongside another member of the detail, which she suggests relates to an earlier tour event that month. And she finds it odd that his public professional profile lists agricultural and insurance work rather than security work.

The second half is a roll call of the detail as these researchers have reconstructed it. She names Brian Harpole, described as the founder of a security firm and as tied to contract disputes; Rick Cutler, described as a former police officer with anti-trafficking work in Guatemala alongside a well-known operator in that field, with reciprocal litigation and accusations between the two men; Dan Flood, described as head of security and, in her phrasing, "surrounded by Mossad conspiracies"; and Pierce Beck, Blake Harruff and JD Davis. She points viewers to a training-company website where several are listed.

She closes on a social-media observation relayed from another account — that a Turning Point staffer follows two of the detail members' accounts — and invites comments.

Two things need saying about that second half. Every person named is a living private individual, none has been charged with anything, and none of the characterisations above is asserted here as fact; they are reported as what the presenter says. The reference to "Mossad conspiracies" is her own description of online speculation about a named person, not a finding, and this site does not adopt it. And a staffer's social-media follow list establishes nothing about anything; it is the weakest item in the video and it is where the clip drifts from correction back into speculation.

What The Footage Shows

The insert sequence tracks the narration closely: a crowd photograph with a bearded man circled in red at 0:05; the corrected-by accounts' profile screenshots from 0:10; a group photograph of men in suits and a portrait at 0:16; event footage and a close-up of a forearm tattoo at 0:20, which is the actual basis of the identification; further crowd photographs at 0:25; Montana landscape photographs with a figure by a lake at 0:28; a professional profile screenshot at 0:35; then, from 0:41 to 1:09, portraits of the other named men, a photograph pairing one of them with the anti-trafficking figure, a training-company logo, and a clip of Kirk at a podium with a guard nearby; a post screenshot at 1:09; a follower-list screenshot at 1:14; and a final clip of a woman near a stage at a TPUSA event.

The tattoo close-up is the only frame in the video that carries evidentiary weight, and it carries it for the correction rather than against anyone. A visible, distinctive tattoo matched between two images is a far better identification method than the facial resemblance that produced the original error — which is precisely the presenter's point.

That is why this page treats the clip as useful. Crowd-sourced face-matching from event imagery has been wrong repeatedly in this investigation, and the site says so plainly elsewhere. Here is a case of it being wrong, being caught, and being corrected in public by the person who got it wrong. The rest of the video should be weighed at the same standard she applied to herself.

How It Connects

Other Videos In This Section

← Back to Named Table Figures · All video evidence