Human Requirements: Law 1 - DoJ/FBI Forced Disclosure
Core Requirement
Force the Department of Justice (DOJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and any other law enforcement agency -- national or local -- to disclose all files and information they have related to their investigation of Charlie Kirk's death. Charlie Kirk was assassinated at Utah Valley University on September 10 2025, and the files these agencies hold are the only records that could settle the contested cause of death.
Key Points
- All investigative files must be released
- Applies to DOJ, FBI, and ALL other law enforcement (federal, state, local)
- No agency may withhold files related to the investigation
- Any government employee may send information to the disclosure group
- It is illegal to persecute any government employee for disclosing information under this law
Improvements to make.
Make sure the following agencies are also covered:
- Treasury
- IRS
As far as Section 1, recovered records. Make sure it includes:
- Investigation files
- FBI/FD 302 reports All investigation information. All forensic information or analysis Anything about domestic or foreign intelligence involvement? Anything about any people more involved than Tyler Robinson. All information about the autopsy, including photos and video All information about any evidence destroyed or any destroyed information or files from any covered organization. Any and all information about TPUSA. Anybody and any information from anyone there or anything there that may be related . Don't scope anything to the state of Utah. Make sure anything is scoped across the US and even internationally.
Any current or former government employee or contractor is allowed to disclose any information about anything involved with the death of Charlie Kirk. No NDA or government secrecy agreement applies.
For any citizen, they have no NDA or any kind of other agreement that is allowed to hold back them from disclosing any and all information.
Reference
This law is modeled after Thomas Massie's legislation to force DOJ disclosure of Jeffrey Epstein files. The parallel is that in both cases, federal law enforcement appears to be withholding critical investigative information from the public.
Back to README | Law Text | Legal Notes | Output Analysis
Public demand context (citizen investigators)
X and court-watchers repeatedly cite withheld FBI/ATF raw files, sealed digital forensics, and incomplete camera dumps as reasons a forced-disclosure statute modeled on Epstein/JFK-style transparency laws is necessary. That political demand is narrative context for Law 1; it does not amend the statutory text above. Former NCTC director Joe Kent has said on the record that his center's parallel review of foreign-nexus leads was ordered to stop once Tyler Robinson was in custody — exactly the kind of closed-off investigative file this disclosure mandate is designed to force into the open.
Interesting In This Area
- The drafted statute is audited against this page, requirement by requirement, in the output analysis.
- Law 2 limits source protection to active sources only, closing the usual exemption.
- Law 4 gives three named investigators two teams each, six teams in total.
- Law 3 makes investigating a duty, with a parallel intelligence assessment directed by the DNI.
Interesting In Other Areas
- The autopsy report has never been published, and the ATF comparison came back inconclusive.
- Government evidence held back is the subject; proof of intel involvement is the argument.
- The Fix section is the plain-language version of what these four bills would force open.
- Joe Kent says a foreign-nexus review stopped before its leads were exhausted.
Images
Other Pages In This Section
Notes: Law 1 - DoJ/FBI Forced Disclosure
The research behind Law 1. The Epstein Files Act passed 427 to 1 and still produced a fraction of its pages; the JFK Records Act left documents withheld thirty years past its deadline. Both failures are why this draft carries hard deadlines and criminal penalties.
Read thisLaw 4: Charlie Kirk Investigation - Trusted Investigators Act
Full text of the trusted investigators act — civilian-led teams embedded inside the FBI and intelligence agencies with full access and their own release authority.
Read thisNotes: Law 2 - US Intelligence Services Forced Disclosure
The research behind Law 2, and its warning. The JFK Records Act ordered release in 1992 and agencies were still withholding in 2025. Intelligence disclosure laws fail on their exemptions, which is why this draft narrows protection to active sources only.
Read this
Four Laws to Force the Truth About Charlie Kirk
The launch article for all four laws in one place: why the Epstein Files Act is the model, and what each bill would force into daylight. Start here if you have never read the statutory text.
Read thisElsewhere In The Investigation
ATF Fragment — Inconclusive Match
The state's own September 17, 2025 ATF report could neither identify nor exclude the seized Mauser as the source of the autopsy jacket fragment. The rifling matched "numerous makes and models" — a class, not a weapon. The defense reportedly calls that exculpatory, and it is a large part of why independent work has moved toward a device at the podium.
Read thisTwo different claims get blurred together: that no autopsy happened, and that one happened and the report was never released. The second is the accurate one, and it is why almost nothing here is settled.
Read thisWhat government bodies have done with the evidence in this case, gathered in one place — withheld records, handling questions, and the specific asks that follow from them.
Read this
Four federal laws modeled on the Epstein Files Act, drafted to force disclosure and mandate a real investigation. Every unanswered question in the aftermath is downstream of records nobody can compel today.
Read thisThis website's author is @HolonCitizen on X and YouTube/@HolonCitizen. Follow me there.
Interesting
- Law 2 names Egyptian tail numbers and UVU jamming Congress would have to explain.
- Hospital footage never surfaced and staff reportedly signed NDAs.
- Fort Huachuca manifests were withheld and FOIA denied, commentators allege.