Skip to main content

Notes: Law 3 - Require Investigation

Precedent: Special Counsel Regulations (28 CFR 600)​

  • The Special Counsel framework provides a model for mandating independent investigations
  • Key feature: investigative independence from DOJ leadership
  • Key lesson: Independence must be structural, not just promised

Precedent: Church Committee (1975)​

  • Senate committee investigated abuses by CIA, NSA, FBI, and IRS
  • Revealed massive intelligence agency overreach
  • Key lesson: Congressional oversight is essential but insufficient alone

Precedent: Warren Commission / HSCA​

  • Warren Commission criticized as predetermined in conclusions
  • HSCA later contradicted Warren Commission findings
  • Key lesson: The "good-faith" investigation definition must explicitly prevent predetermined conclusions

Key Improvement: 175 Items as Mandatory Investigation Targets​

The major improvement is that the investigation must specifically pursue each lead from Schedule A:

  1. The "good-faith investigation" definition now explicitly includes pursuing all leads from the 175 items
  2. Section 2(d) enumerates specific mandatory investigation targets in 8 categories
  3. The external monitor (Section 6) verifies leads are being pursued
  4. Reports must address each Schedule A category (Section 8(d))
  5. The conflict of interest trigger (Section 4(c)) addresses the self-investigation problem

Analysis​

Pros​

  • Addresses the gap where agencies may have files but never actually investigated
  • 175 items as mandatory investigation targets ensures nothing is ignored
  • Dedicated team and budget prevent resource starvation
  • External independent monitor (not internal inspector) provides real oversight
  • Conflict of interest trigger automatically transfers authority if agencies are implicated
  • 90-day interim reports create accountability checkpoints
  • Parallel law enforcement and intelligence tracks cover both domains

Cons​

  • Mandating specific agents (20) and budget ($10M) may face appropriations challenges
  • 18-month timeline may be insufficient
  • "Good-faith investigation" is inherently subjective
  • FBI investigating potential FBI involvement creates conflict (partially addressed by Section 4(c))

Key Improvement: Conflict of Interest Trigger​

Previous version had no mechanism for what happens when the investigating agency is itself implicated. Section 4(c) now creates an automatic transfer to an independent commission. This addresses the single biggest weakness of the previous version.

Interesting In This Area​

Interesting In Other Areas​

Other Pages In This Section​

Output Analysis: Law 3 - Require Investigation

The audit of Law 3 against the citizen requirements: a mandated investigation with its own team, budget and timeline, and a parallel intelligence assessment directed by the DNI. Every requirement is checked against the section that carries it.

Read this
This is a high-resolution photograph or digital scan of a printed document featuring four paragraphs of English text on a white page.

Human Requirements: Law 2 - US Intelligence Services Forced Disclosure

The plain-English demand behind Law 2: every part of the intelligence community — CIA, NSA, DIA, NRO — releases what it holds, and blocking an employee from coming forward becomes a crime.

Read this

SVG Slide Requirements — Law #4

The slide specification for Law 4, built to the same template as the other three. The frame has to make one idea legible at a glance — investigators the public actually trusts, working inside the agencies.

Read this
This image is a wide, horizontally stitched panoramic photograph showing a large crowd of young adults gathered outdoors for a political event on a tiered concrete university…

Additional Disclosure Items to Consider (Beyond the 175) — ALL ADDED

Twenty-six disclosure items proposed beyond the original list, all since folded into Schedule A of every bill. This is where family statements, witness-intimidation records and other late additions entered the text.

Read this

Elsewhere In The Investigation​

This image is a digital screenshot of a news article from the WEAR News 3 website, viewed on a mobile device.

Court & Trial

State of Utah v. Tyler Robinson, case 251403576, is where the government's narrative meets adversarial testing — every court date, the day-by-day preliminary hearing transcripts, and the inconclusive ATF ballistics.

Read this

Government Evidence

What government bodies have done with the evidence in this case, gathered in one place — withheld records, handling questions, and the specific asks that follow from them.

Read this
This is a satellite map image annotated with a timeline and route details tracing the movements of a suspect referred to as a "bomber" in Washington, D.C.

Bomb Dogs Standdown

The reported claim is that bomb-sniffing dogs were kept from certain zones of the scene. If a device was involved, K-9 screening was the one method most likely to have caught it — days before the ground was paved.

Read this

NCTC — National Counterterrorism Center

The center that integrates terrorism intelligence across agencies, its chain of command running up to the President, and the reported order that stopped its foreign-involvement inquiry.

Read this

Sources​

This website's author is @HolonCitizen on X and YouTube/@HolonCitizen. Follow me there.

Interesting​