Skip to main content

Human Requirements: Law 4 - Trusted Investigations

Core Requirement

This law exists because Charlie Kirk was assassinated on September 10 2025 and no government body has produced an account of how he was killed that independent investigators accept. The only public proceeding to date is the Utah court case against a single charged defendant, which by design cannot examine the agencies themselves.

Allow a specific set of trusted individuals to each have their own team within the FBI and within US intelligence to work alongside government investigators. These trusted people and their teams conduct the investigation. Nothing is allowed to stop them. They can release the information.

Trusted People

Key Points

  • Each trusted person gets a team within the FBI AND a team within US intelligence
  • The trusted person chooses who they do and don't want to work with on those teams
  • Government employees on these teams do the actual investigation
  • Nothing is allowed to stop these teams
  • They are allowed to release the information publicly
  • Classified information not required for results will be removed (redacted), but the results/conclusions must be disclosed
  • Any government employee can submit requests to be part of these teams
  • It is illegal for managers to stop government employees from joining or for there to be any persecution for participating
  • Any government employee may also send information to the group for disclosure
  • It is illegal to persecute anyone for doing so

Back to README | Law Text | Legal Notes | Output Analysis

See also: Law 1 Requirements | Law 2 Requirements | Law 3 Requirements

Interesting In This Area

Interesting In Other Areas

Images

Other Pages In This Section

Notes: Law 4 - Trusted Investigations

The precedent file for Law 4 as first assembled — special counsels, the 9/11 Commission, congressional clearance authority. The 9/11 Commission is the load-bearing example: private citizens holding subpoena power and classified access.

Read this

Charlie Kirk Assassination — Forced Disclosure

The section hub for all four proposed federal laws, plus the court discovery list and the exploding-microphone disclosure items. Full statutory text, not summaries.

Read this
This is a high-resolution photograph or digital scan of a printed document featuring four paragraphs of English text on a white page.

Human Requirements: Law 3 - Require Investigation

The demand behind Law 3 is different from disclosure. The concern is not only that files are withheld but that the case is reportedly not being worked, so the requirement is stated plainly: the FBI and the intelligence services must investigate.

Read this

Output Analysis: Law 4 - Trusted Investigations

The audit of Law 4: two teams per designated investigator, six in all, each with sole authority over who joins. Every citizen requirement is checked against the section that delivers it.

Read this

Elsewhere In The Investigation

This is a digital composite image designed as a political or investigative graphic, featuring portraits of public figures Charlie Kirk and Candace Owens overlaid against two…

New Laws (Fix)

Four federal laws modelled on the Epstein Files Transparency Act, plus reform plans for evidence handling and event security. This is where subscriber identities behind a geography bucket would actually be compelled into view.

Read this
This image is a digital screenshot of a news article from the WEAR News 3 website, viewed on a mobile device.

Court & Trial

State of Utah v. Tyler Robinson, case 251403576, is where the government's narrative meets adversarial testing — every court date, the day-by-day preliminary hearing transcripts, and the inconclusive ATF ballistics.

Read this
Visual Representation of Reported Injuries — anatomical chart marking, in red, the reported injury locations across the front and back torso, the neck, the internal chest, and two views of the brain.

FBI

Federal posture, ballistics stewardship, witness coordination and the press briefings — plus the open questions that make disclosure the point. The bureau is a subject here, not a source.

Read this
A digital screenshot of a legislative web page displaying a structured table titled "History." The table documents the chronologically ordered legislative actions taken on a…

Your Actions Fix It

Concrete things one person can do: records requests, contacting representatives, preserving and sharing evidence. It is the shortest route from reading this site to changing anything on it.

Read this

This website's author is @HolonCitizen on X and YouTube/@HolonCitizen. Follow me there.

Interesting