Witnesses, Security Personnel, and Citizen Investigators (Context Only)
Every group described below is here for one reason: Charlie Kirk was assassinated in front of them on September 10, 2025, and the cause of that death remains the central open question of this investigation.
Overview
This Level_3 page provides a neutral overview of several groups of people who appear frequently in footage, reporting, and online analysis of the Charlie Kirk case:
- Event attendees and eyewitnesses,
- Security and staff near the stage, and
- Citizen investigators and content creators.
It does not accuse any individual of wrongdoing. Many of the names listed here appear because they have been visible in public footage, have given interviews, or have been discussed by commentators; allegations or theories involving them are treated as claims in specific topic sections. Full roster: People Investigation Index. Related witness and videographer profiles include Hunter Kozak, noted for his final question to Charlie Kirk, and Charles McClintock Wilson, whose stills have been discussed publicly.
Event attendees and eyewitnesses (as reported/claims)
Various individuals present at the UVU event have drawn attention because of their proximity to key moments or their later public statements:
- Ryne Simmons (as reported/claims):
- In an X/Twitter thread by
@ninoboxer, Simmons states that he recorded a close‑up 4K/60fps video of the shooting and later shared it with the FBI, who allegedly asked him to delete it. He says he retained a copy. - His account is central to discussions of video handling and censorship, covered in Media Censorship and Media Narratives and Censorship After the UVU Event.
- In an X/Twitter thread by
- Skyler Baird (claims):
- Baird appears in multiple video angles near Charlie at the moment of the shot and later at memorial events, sometimes with media access.
- Online commentators have raised questions about his movements and role; these are treated as speculative claims in Patsies and Distraction Actors.
- Other unnamed witnesses (as reported/claims):
- Many other attendees provided interviews to local and national media or shared footage on social platforms. Their contributions are referenced throughout Videos, Shooting Locations, and Media.
These individuals are important because of what they saw or recorded, not because being present implies culpability.
Security and staff near the stage (as reported/claims)
Several people visible near Charlie at the event have been singled out for closer scrutiny in online analysis:
- Close‑protection and security staff (as reported/claims):
- Names such as Rick Cutler, Laine Schoneberger, Dan Flood, and others appear in analyses of security posture and crowd management.
- Some videos and X/Twitter threads propose detailed theories about specific individuals’ movements (for example, palm‑gun or signaling hypotheses). These theories are explored—explicitly as claims—in Close‑Range “Real Killer” Theories and Patsies and Distraction Actors.
- Independent of those theories, these individuals are documented as having security or staff roles at or around the event.
- Campus security and UVU staff (as reported):
- UVU‑affiliated personnel, including campus police officers and event staff, appear in crowd‑control roles and logistics. Their presence and actions are discussed in Security & Law Enforcement and Before.
Mention of security and staff here serves to locate their roles in the public record, not to draw conclusions about responsibility.
Citizen investigators and content creators (as reported/claims)
A large part of the public understanding of this case has been shaped by independent online investigators and commentators:
- Video analysts and researchers (as reported/claims):
- Accounts such as
@ProjectConstitu,@JG_CSTT,@BlakeBednarz, and others have produced flight‑path reconstructions, acoustic studies, 3D site models, and frame‑by‑frame video analyses. - Their work is often cited in sections like Timeline, Planes, Drones, and Killer as examples of citizen‑driven inquiry, while being clearly distinguished from official investigations.
- Accounts such as
- Legal and political commentators (as reported/claims):
- Attorneys and commentators using Substack, podcasts, and X/Twitter (for example, those who analyze gag orders or Google Trends data) have contributed legal and political framing that appears in Motive, Legal Investigation, and Media.
- Media figures covering the case (as reported):
- Public figures such as Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, and others have discussed the case on their shows, sometimes sharing texts, clips, or interpretations that significantly influence public narratives.
These individuals are included here because their work and commentary help shape the broader conversation about the case, not because they are alleged to have participated in the event itself.
How to use this page
Use this page as a navigation aid:
- To find where particular people are discussed in context (e.g., witness video, security posture, legal process).
- To remember that being named or analyzed in this project does not imply guilt; many individuals are included because their public roles or footage are relevant to understanding what happened, not because any court has found them responsible for a crime.
Laws (Charlie Kirk)
- Records of FBI agents asking witnesses to delete videos and the retained 4K footage of the shooting and the security staff's positioning and radio logs are things that the Charlie Kirk Investigation Laws may result in powerful truths coming out that aren't out yet.
Citizen Investigator Claims on X (Witnesses, Security, Investigators)
- Citizen investigator accounts with high mid-case impact include Candace Owens, Stew Peters, Project Constitution, Jon Bray, and numerous OSINT handles analyzing video, flights, and contracts.
- Security / near-stage witnesses (for example, Alex Faria, Blake Haruff, Andrew Feraci, Angie Martin) appear as percipient witnesses for reported observations of blood, movement, and audio — material often cited in efforts to reconstruct the sequence of events.
- Theories alleging intentional wrongdoing by named close-protection staff circulate on X. This site does not adopt any such theory as fact and records only public statements and documented positions; no court has found these individuals responsible for a crime.
- Questions about witness reliability (such as chest-shot accounts and a reportedly silent hospital contractor) are discussed further in the Witness Reliability and Medical witness sections.
Commentator coverage: Citizen journalist Ian Carroll is among the most-cited independent investigators of the case — flying his own drone over the Losee Center roof, collaborating with Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, and Sam Parker, and, according to his posts, receiving threats after September 10 — his analyses are public commentary, not official findings.
Interesting In This Area
- Three men carried Charlie with blood visible on their clothing.
- Hunter Kozak asked the last question Charlie Kirk ever answered.
- A ZUMA photojournalist's stills are examined here as evidence, not as illustration.
- A retired officer who took cover said she did not know whether he was the shooter.
Interesting In Other Areas
- Witness after witness described a chest wound, then one account reversed.
- Crowd phone footage is more complete than the institutional cameras never released.
- Rooftop and perimeter failures start with a thin campus contingent.
- Candace Owens surfaced several document trails now cited across this site.
Images
Other Pages In This Section
He asked Charlie Kirk the last question Charlie Kirk ever answered. He is an event witness rather than a hearing witness — a distinction this site keeps insisting on, because the two carry different weight.
Read this
The ZUMA photojournalist whose stills from the courtyard have been pulled apart frame by frame. Professional press coverage, examined here as evidence rather than as illustration.
Read thisOne of the men who reportedly helped carry Charlie Kirk from the stage, with blood visible on his clothing in the footage. Clothing that close to the wound is forensic material — if it was ever tested.
Read this
Elsewhere In The Investigation
Shot to the Heart — The Repeated Theme and the Shaped-Charge Question
Witness after witness described a chest wound rather than a neck wound — the same wrong detail, from people who did not know each other. That repetition is either mass error or a clue.
Read this
Dozens of phones were recording. Their combined coverage is more complete than the institutional cameras that were never released, which is why the crowd's footage keeps mattering.
Read this
No Counter-Snipers or Secret Service
No counter-snipers, no Secret Service, an overlooked rooftop, and a speaker with a documented threat history. This page is about what was not there.
Read this
The single largest independent engine driving this investigation into public view. Several of the document trails cited across this site surfaced first on her episodes.
Read thisThis website's author is @HolonCitizen on X and YouTube/@HolonCitizen. Follow me there.
Interesting
- A major donor reportedly cut ties shortly before the killing, over Israel.
- Kirk reportedly said he had no choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause the day before.
- One researcher claims 16 Israeli phones sat beside Kirk at the moment of death.